• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Front Shocks: Stud or Eyering?


Thighman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
157
Age
38
City
California
Vehicle Year
1990
Transmission
Automatic
Is there any performance difference between shocks that mount with an eyering and those with a stud?

I have Skyjacker 4" coils and not sure whether it is worth it to modify the coil bucket for the F-250 shock mount (eyering). I don't think the coils will flex enough to max out the current shocks (but feel free to chime in if you think/know so).

Assuming that there is not a limiting issue in flex, is there still a general performance advantage to the Eyering style mount???

Thanks
 
I don't see any real differences in performance coming specifically from the mounts it uses.

However something I have noticed with shocks that use a stud is they tend to be valved stiffer than ones with eyes on both ends. I think this is because studded shocks tend to be applied to independent suspensions more often than shocks having two eyes (independent suspensions usually have a leverage ratio on the shock whereas solid beam axles work the shocks closer to a 1:1 ratio).

If you use a rebuildable type shock (Fox, King, higher-end Bilstein stuff, etc.), you can have the shock valved (or valve it yourself) for whatever stiffness you want.
 
Thanks for your input. Glad to see you still are helping us all out.

What do you think about the limitation of flex? I haven't tested it in a while, but I don't think the TTB coils will compress enough to warrant a longer shock length. Thoughts?
 
Probably not if you're running standard TTB lift coils and you're not running a long-travel set up for speed running.

Some of us who do a bit of rock crawling run coils from a Jeep XJ or early Bronco application which are softer than TTB lift coils, these will find the travel limits of a shock on stock mounts much sooner.
 
Thanks again junkie for your input. I tried to Jeep coils on my initial build. Not what I wanted in terms of handling and street manners. I want this to be a daily driver that also sees off road. Anyway, thanks again!
 
That's very interesting. Could flex too much though.
 
I found that interesting too, and also wondered about flex. I think it could work with the right support/ bracing.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
 
Yeah I see that thing causing the spring/shock tower to crack.

Several here (including myself) have used '90s F-250 shock mounts by cutting the shock area of the coil bucket off and then welding it straight to the F-250 mount (reinforcing it where needed).

Some pics on this page:
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/F250shocktower.shtml
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top