I picked up a 2.3 L Mitsubishi Turbo-Diesel out of an '86 Ranger last fall and stuffed it in my Dodge D50 Ext cab 4x4. The idea was to see what these engines are really like before I drop one into my '04 Ranger.
After 6 mths of runnin the Mitsu, I am looking for one to convert my Ranger. It wont bolt up to my 5 spd auto, but I'll either make an adapter plate or just get a tranny from an older Ranger, as they bolt right up.
At first the thing was a dog, but after turning the pump up, it will run with any 2.9. Parts arent exactly "readily available" but if you know where to look, its not bad. The mileage is unbelievable. I'm not a fast driver, and with the 5 spd std. I get 45 mpg Can. hiway.
The downside to all of these conversions is, it costs a couple grand to do it. Depending on the miles driven, it may or may not pay.
Run with a 2.9? you are kidding right?
The Mitsubishi turbo diesel has a whopping 86hp and there isn't all that much room to "turn it up" to have a prayer with keeping up with a 2.9.
Frankly I've driven a 2.3Turbo-Diesel (factory installed in a Mitsubishi)
and wasn't that impressed.
It was kinda "Breathy" compared to the 80HP I was getting from
my all cast iron gear driven injector pump Nissan.
that was the engine I wanted to add a turbo to...
While I owned a 1982 SR-5 Toyota Diesel (62hp)
I test drove a toyota turbo-Diesel(2L-T engine 93hp!) being sold
by a friend of a friend and agreed to buy it,
but at the last minute the owner sold it to a friend of his.
IF I had gotten that truck you'd have never heard of me
because my NOT buying it led directly to getting my Ranger supercab.
while some diesels feel "unstoppable" because of their low end torque
Horsepower is horsepower and whoever has more is the winner.
But the Mitsubishi 4D55 Turbo-diesel only cranks out 129ft/lb
The Little diesels also don't make the 170ft/lb you'd get from a 2.9
so they'd lose there too.
the 355ft/lb of a 130hp Cummins 4BT is another matter,
but that's a 3.9liter turbodiesel.
but the 4BT weighs in at 745lbs...
AD