INFO Dana 35 TTB vs Wheel Bearings


Jim Oaks

Just some guy with a website

Founder / Site Owner
Administrator
💻 TRS Socials
Article Contributor
TRS Event Participant
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS 25th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Aug 2, 2000
Messages
15,834
Points
7,601
Age
58
City
Nocona
State - Country
TX - USA
Other
2005 Jaguar XJ8
Vehicle Year
2021
Vehicle
Ford Ranger
Drive
4WD
Engine
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
Total Lift
3.5-inches
Tire Size
295/70/17
I'm trying to gather real world feedback versus online gossip, rumors, and hearsay.

I think the Dana 35 TTB and Dana 44 TTB are good axles, but what sets the Dana 44 apart isn't necessarily the ring gear size but the wheel bearing spacing.

I'm curious to know what your experience has been with the Dana 35 TTB and wheel bearings. I personally had a right front wheel bearing go bad driving on the interstate and had to change it in the parking lot of a parts store. At the time I was doing about 65 MPH on 33-inch tires. This may have resulted from a lack of maintenance. But then, is it normal for a wheel bearing to need so much maintenance?

Have you not had any problems with them and if so, what size tires are you using?

Does it seem like they're a constant wear item that you have to replace, and if so, what size tires are you using and what kind of highway speeds do they see?

Have you had one fail while driving, and again, what size tire are you using and what kind of speeds do they see?

Below is a photo of a Dana 44 spindle (left) and Dana 35 spindle (right) for those that aren't familiar with the difference in wheel bearing spacing.

Dana 35 TTB vs Wheel Bearings
 
I run the D35. For it's originally intended use and loading, I think it's fine. I have been using 35" BFGs on it for 10 years, roughly. Currently, my front axle is carrying in excess of 2500lbs continuously. In my experience, I have replaced very few wheel bearings, considering what I do with the truck, maybe 2 full replacements other than brake rotor replacements, at most. I think that is a good record.

What I HAVE noticed, is that after re-assembly for any reason, I need to do 2 things. 1. I run the preload torque just a tiny bit high due to the larger tires. I use 20-22in-lbs instead of 17in-lbs. 2. After driving 100-200 miles, I re-check the preload. Several times, I have found that it has loosened up. That indicates that the bearings have moved "settled in" so-to-speak. I do the same procedure evry time and have been doing it for many years. But sometimes, you just don't get the outer races perfectly seated on the first go-around. Always double check after druving a bit.

Is that photo new? Or has it been on the site forever? I knew the D44 had wider bearing spacing. But I don't recall seeing that image showing the difference. Could just be poor memory. That makes the advantage incredibly obvious to anyone who understands bearings and mechanical design. That is more difference than I thought it was. I have often thought about swapping to the D44 spindles and outer assemblies or complete D44 axle assemblies. But, since my experience with the D35 has been so good, I just haven't thought it worth the trouble. It is in the back of my mind that after my V8 swap, I will need to re-evaluate front suspension and maybe upgrade the axle in some way.

But, overall, I have been very happy with the D35.
 
Last edited:
I have mixed feelings about the D-35. After shattering an axle shaft in it on 35” tires with no locker that is. Of course, now I’m aware there was a mechanical interference that likely was the culprit but it still left me contemplating options. The last like two years have been the most I’ve driven the Choptop with the 35” tires and D-35 since I originally got the truck and worked my way up to that configuration.

I did find a bad bearing and race when I last overhauled the front axle but it looked more like a possible part defect that I only noticed when I cleaned the grease off things rather than a wear issue. No other issues noted.

My 92 Ranger had 30” tires and the D-35. For the like two years I ran it before someone decided to hit me I didn’t have any issues with the bearings in the front.

I’ve had more issues with bearings in the rear axles and the unit bearings on the front of the 98-11 trucks than the D-35. Didn’t really have any problems with the bearings in the D-28, I had far more trouble with the U-joints and spindly shafts with those.
 
I thought half the problems were down to
  • Inner ring way too tight (didn't actually check rotational preload)
  • Outer ring too loose (backs off doing truck stuff)
But those shouldn't be unique to the D35 vs other spindles, so maybe not.
 

Sponsored Ad

TRS Events & Gatherings

Latest posts

Featured Rangers

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

TRS Latest Video

Official TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Ranger Sponsors


Product Suggestions

Back
Top