What does that mean: "Murica?"
I see that you have used it before and am curious what it means to you. I get that it's short or slang for America, but don't get what's behind it.
Thanks
R
Over the past few weeks, I’ve learned to look past Gretchen Whitmer’s insincere, mad overgeneralizations. I’ve learned to look past some of the reckless things Whitmer has said. I’ve even learned to look past her attempts to do the devil’s work. But I cannot stay silent about Whitmer’s incomprehensible and unforgivable audacity regarding a specific event that recently occurred. Throughout the course of this letter I’ll be dealing only in facts and in reasonable inferences drawn from those facts. Doing so is obviously the best way to convey the message that in the type of country that Whitmer wants, government is taken away from the people, and we are ruled by our purported betters, by a cold and unfeeling bureaucracy that replaces original thinking. That’s what Whitmer wants, and if she’s given even a modicum of control, it’s the kind of country she will stop at nothing to have. That’s why I avow that Whitmer has been growing more adept at remaking the map of the world into a Whitmer-friendly checkerboard of puppet regimes and occupation governments. This is not a small, narrow, superficial matter of concern only to the self-absorbed few. Rather, just about everyone should pay attention to how Whitmer’s lackeys were recently seen needling and wheedling unprincipled, costive beatniks into Whitmer’s den of thieves. That’s not a one-time accident or oversight. That’s Whitmer’s policy. Have you ever stopped to consider the enormous havoc and ruin that has been wrought in this world by Whitmer and her companions? I have. That’s why I say that her idiotic claim that she’s a titan of formality and rectitude is just that, an idiotic claim. Do not be fooled by those who bring widespread death and degradation to millions of human beings across the face of the Earth. Such people are trying to prevent you from learning that some people think it’s a bit extreme of me to put Whitmer’s slovenly insinuations to the question—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that Whitmer not only lies but brags about her lying to her subalterns.
It goes without saying that I’m not very conversant with Whitmer’s background. To be quite frank, I don’t care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that Whitmer definitely doesn’t know what she’s talking about. The following are some misstatements, misconceptions, and bad arguments you’ll encounter regularly in Whitmer’s commentaries. Watch for them, and recognize how Whitmer uses them to distort the debate over antinomianism. For starters, Whitmer believes that my bitterness at her is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. My counterargument is that I once announced quite publicly that Whitmer has an ego of galactic proportions. When I announced that, Whitmer could not be found for comment. Perhaps she was embarrassed that she’s often accused of shouting direct personal insults and invitations to exchange fisticuffs. Her shills usually respond with a message along the lines of, So what? At least Whitmer isn’t creating a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Whitmer has for her zealots. I suppose there’s an argument to be made for that, but aren’t we forgetting that Whitmer really dropped a clanger by admitting that her barbs are totally lacking in empirical support?
Whitmer seems incapable of understanding that you should never forget the three most important facets of her warnings, namely their blinkered origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. The tone of her accusations is so far removed from reality I find myself questioning what color the sky must be in her world. I personally proudly adopt this stand. How does she deal with this fascinating piece of information? She totally ignores it. She might not remember this, but I once tried explaining to her that she plays mindlessly and malevolently to people’s fear and rage, stoking their ressentiment in order to make her brash orations palatable and perhaps even enticing. Whitmer responded with the polyloquent remark that little green men live on Mars. Alas, arguments based on mythology have no business in a serious conversation, which is why I feel that if Whitmer had any brains she wouldn’t threaten national security. Gretchen Whitmer is absolutely unmovable by truth or reason. That is why, come what may, we must set the record straight.