• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Converting a 1982 Econoline van to 4x4


Jim Oaks

Just some guy with a website
Administrator
Founder / Site Owner
Supporting Vendor
Article Contributor
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 2, 2000
Messages
14,984
Age
57
City
Nocona
State - Country
TX - USA
Other
2005 Jaguar XJ8
Vehicle Year
2021
Vehicle
Ford Ranger
Drive
4WD
Engine
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
Total Lift
3.5-inches
Tire Size
295/70/17
attachment.php


I have a 1982 Ford Econoline 2WD Sportsmobile. I want to convert it to 4x4, but I'd like to use a Dana 50 TTB. All Dana 44 axles are 4-inches to short.

I'm wondering if I could swap in the engine crossmember from a 1980's F250, and the TTB mount brackets.

I don't know how the 80's econoline and F250 frame widths compare.

I did find this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghO5YhFezKY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghO5YhFezKY

That guy's using a Dana 44 TTB. My guess is he used a 2-inch spacer at the front wheels.

Wondering if anyone here has seen or have information on a swap like this.

Thanks!
 
I'm not sure about frame width comparisons either, but if you want to use F-250 parts you need to watch your spring types. 2wd F-250+ trucks were coil sprung, and 4x4s were leafs in the front on the TTB years.
 
We have a few 4x4 Sheriffs van at work (Quigley's), they use solid axles from f350s, and run wheel spacers. It seems like the van rear axle is a little wider then the truck axle.

Quigley's cuts out quite a bit of the stock crossmember for clearance of the front diff and then plates the hell out of what's left. Fitting the 4x4 truck crossmember sounds like a much better idea.

I know a company in Canada called Clydesdale used to convert vans to TTB 4x4, but I don't know if they are still around. Try finding some pics of their conversions for ideas.
 
The Econoline uses coil springs, so it would seem like a Dana 44 out of a '78-'79 Bronco would work well using the Bronco's radius arms, but I don't know if the mounts for the radius arms are out far enough on the axle to fit the Econoline. Plus, I don't know how I feel about a 2-inch wheel spacer on the front.
 
spacers on the front sounds like a recipe for major bump steer to me, not to mention bearing wear.
 
I sent a message to a guy in California that has done a Dana 50 TTB on a 1990 Econoline van.

We build Dana 50 4X4 conversions, by welding in new center pivot brackets on the existing van cross member - much easier to do. We have grafted in Ford cross members in Chevy frames for Twin I-Beam and Twin Traction-Beam conversions - it is more work. We have a fixture that bolts on to the cross member and gives us the location of the pivot points - once we created that, the process became pretty efficient. I know that the '90 cross member was essentially the same as the later models and that our fixture bolted right in. I don't know if an '82 cross member is the same. Beside the pivot brackets, there are a lot of modification to the cross member for differential clearance that are needed and then that all needs to be reinforces and gusseted.

There are only two pivot points - not worth fighting frame width, frame shape, motor mounts... when grafting in a F250 cross member.

I would think a 4 - 6 inch lift would help reduce the need to modify the cross member to clear the differential. If I got the Skyjacker drop brackets for the D50 TTB, I would have to figure out a way to know where to add them to the existing cross member.
 
Jim, what about doing a body swap to a 4x4 f250 frame? Might not be what you want to do, but you could gain both 4x4 and better braking front & rear, and not be lifted very high...

SVT
 
Wow.

It's crazy to think that the F-250 Dana 50 front axle width is wider than a F-150 Dana 44, but the F-150 TTB beam is longer:

attachment.php
 
We have a few 4x4 Sheriffs van at work (Quigley's), they use solid axles from f350s, and run wheel spacers. It seems like the van rear axle is a little wider then the truck axle.

Quigley's cuts out quite a bit of the stock crossmember for clearance of the front diff and then plates the hell out of what's left. Fitting the 4x4 truck crossmember sounds like a much better idea.

We get a Quigley van in every so often. We have one waiting to get picked up right now, just had to put an engine in it.
 
Jim, what about doing a body swap to a 4x4 f250 frame? Might not be what you want to do, but you could gain both 4x4 and better braking front & rear, and not be lifted very high...

SVT

That seems like it would be a lot of work.

I realized today that the 2wd beams on my van have king pins. How in the world do you do an alignment and adjust camber on a king pin beam???
 
The D50 doesn't look like it would have much wheel travel compared to the D44 F150.

I don't like the idea of raising the center of gravity on a van. It's a half-ton from the 80s, which will be softer than a modern half ton. It's probably around a 6,000# GVWR. My E350 has a 9,500# GVWR and has handled a trailer with 2,000# of tongue weight, but it can still leave your butt gripping the seat cushions on certain curves on state highways. I thought about a 4x4 conversion when I first got it, but not the way we drive. I don't want more weight up high. Besides, my van has stock 32" tall tires and even without a locker does fine in the snow. It ignores anything under 8".

The advantage a van has over a pickup is it has a lot more weight on the rear axle. Putting a locker in there and adding mud tires will make it surprisingly capable. A pickup really needs 4wd because it has a great majority of its weight over the front wheels. A 2wd van is better than a 2wd pickup by far. A 4x4 van is cool, but I don't think it is that desirable if it means raising it. We thumb the cruise on at 75mph a few times a year and take half-asleep shifts at the wheel with an enormous amount of crap and human bodies strapped in everywhere. Offroad capability is much less of a concern to us--it's already a bad handling vehicle. We use it to travel. It's not ever going to be a good offroad vehicle, but it's great through floods and such, and good in snow.
 
I'd be content with a 2-inch suspension lift and 2-inch body lift, but I'm faced with the king pin dilemma and how to align it with a 2-inch lift.
 
That seems like it would be a lot of work.

I realized today that the 2wd beams on my van have king pins. How in the world do you do an alignment and adjust camber on a king pin beam???


Bend the beams. That's the way I had to adjust the camber on my old 2wd F350 after I lowered it. It used to be common practice on I-beam Fords.
 
I wonder if alignment shops will even do that anymore?
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top