• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Best spark plug


I've used Autolite Iridium XPs (fine wire type) with very good results.
Would recommend them to anyone trying to improve performance...
got them cheaper with rebate.
 
I've used Autolite Iridium XPs (fine wire type) with very good results.
Would recommend them to anyone trying to improve performance...
got them cheaper with rebate.

I hope Big Jim doesn't find out! :D Add in the undersize pulley, e-fan, and K&N, and you're in "big trouble", lol.
 
Ok fixizin!!

I hope Big Jim doesn't find out! :D Add in the undersize pulley, e-fan, and K&N, and you're in "big trouble", lol.

:D I found it! Fixizin you must be asking for trouble!!:rolleyes:

I am constantly amazed at guys bragging on their oil and their sparks.. But baldy will have to read some of my other posts to find out what I think of his improved performance with OFFBRAND sparks..
Big JIm :wub:
 
:D I found it! Fixizin you must be asking for trouble!!:rolleyes:

I am constantly amazed at guys bragging on their oil and their sparks.. But baldy will have to read some of my other posts to find out what I think of his improved performance with OFFBRAND sparks..
Big JIm :wub:

Baldy has done everything else to screw his truck up (UDPs, e-fan, K&N, intake, etc.) he might as well be consistant and screw up with the plugs too!!
 
Yeah, oldbaldy454, welcome to the forum. I do hope you come back after being slammed by a couple of arrogant "know it alls." :) shady
 
i agree with shadetree.......

ford may have some great engineers, but they have to make the vehicle reliable for even the most idiotic of people. Not everyone knows proper vehicle care or maintenance. There has to be a certain amount of compensation or fudge factor. What I am trying to say is the vehicles are dumbed down on purpose. They are not engineered to make 100% efficiency. That would require a perfect world which we don't have, unless i woke up this morning inside one of my screwy dreams. Again, all things are relative. If oldbaldy feels his modifications are improvements, then they most likely are for him. Who are we to disagree. What works for one person may not work for the rest of us. That is what makes us individuals. Otherwise we would all be running around in one car, going to the same job with the same look with litle or no opinion opinion.

enough ranting...

Welcome baldy. please post more here at the Ranger Forums....
 
I like the fine wire Autolite Iridium XPs over the stock Motorcraft plugs.

I've tried Bosch plugs in the 3.0 Ford Vulcan engine, but did not work well in this application, whereas they did worked well in 3800 GM vehicles.
The platium tips burn down below the ceramic crown too fast and wear out which causes misfire in most vehicles( like 3.3 and 3.8 Chysler minivans)

The XPs seem to make the idle a bit faster and I've got up to 24 mpg on road trips with 89 octane, (not that mpg with E85 by any means) The advertised lifetime on the XPs says you never have to change plugs again...well, we'll see about that claim after a few more years.

I am going to try another tank of E85 now that I have smaller tires to see if a lighter load on the engine will help the mpg with Ethanol on this 2000 corn burner....
 
PS...Thanks for all of the nice comments..I just read through them. I bought this truck to play with and not to keep stock...it has been experiemental since day one...

Last month my engineer son-in-law had it running on hydrogen with a electroytic generator, plugged the air inlet and fed the H gas in thru the PCV valve inlet tube...so far so good ...it idled just fine.. May work on a system to boost to 30-40 mpg and not use any gasoline or to supplement the loss in engine efficiency when burning E85 with the stock compression ratio. (E85 works best with a 15:1 ratio which would blow most engines, unless made to run like a diesel)

We were also considering a hybrid coversion electric system with PLC controller, but have been going in other directions as high efficieny Li-Ion battery power plants have been expensive and not enough raw materials for everyone on planet earth to adapt.

- Old Baldy, Retired state university electronics professor,
with too much time on my hands not to try to modify an underpowered Ford.
 
Bob, Thanks for the link. I see that you are an IBM engineer by trade.

Our Chrysler T&C mini van also runs better on stock plugs as well. After changing plugs (and wires) after 30k miles due to a recall on 04s for engine misfire with defective mfg plugs, the dealer retuned it and no problems since.
Gee I thought stock plugs were good for 100K or more these days of fuel injected engines....not so if they are mistakenly made to fail by faulty manufacturing...must have been a fluke.

The 3.0 Ranger is another case... We have 5 vehicles and the 3.0 is the smallest engine of any. I bought it with 76k miles instead of an ATV (aka Polaris Ranger side-by side)... and it has been a fun toy. You would think that the smallest engine would give the best mpg, but duh NO....duh...the Caddy with the 4.6 Northstar does better, and approaches 30 mpg on the highway, and of course, is too fun to tromp on the 300 HP around town so it doesn't get that efficiency for city mpg ratings. Thats what we use the Ranger for now -short town trips - and for being a Toad behind a V10 Winne motohome (with the rear drive shaft removed towed in 2wd Park) and run in 4wd drive mode off the front axle with Warn Vacuum hubs when we arrive at a travel destination....hey what else can I learn and do with this thing???

I bought a 2000 Ford Ranger Electrical diagrams manual on ebay for $8 ( which has baled me out several times) ....the best investment so far. I have re-engineered several items on it with aftermarket and find somethings help and others definately do not. The rear signal/tail lights were a challenge to hook up for the Toad pulling mode and had to disconnect the turn signal switch to enable. Have a jumper plug to enable in standard run mode.

In a graduate study at the University of Nebraska, some folks there modified a 1999 Chevy Silverado for maximzing E85 use. I have been trying to do some of the same things for this underpowered corn burner 4x4 off-road Ranger with over sized 245 75 16 stock tires.

Some of the suggestions on the RBS ranger forums have also helped. Thanks.

It is a balence between mpg and power gain. The best mpg was with the stock MAF sensor, and when I removed the center support rail on a junk yard replacement, the shift points changed slightly and a bit better throttle response, which was mushy before with stock.

My home made 3" ABS air intake - to the original stock air box - (not drawing in hot engine air) may also increase the air flow and easy at which it breathes at higher end rpms.
It runs good now and I hate to do much else to it. I had tried an aluminum air intake, but it was junk, so went to plastic, more like the OEM tube.

The last mod was to go to 225 60 16 tires - used ones from our Caddy. Easy swap and now looking for a re-cal device for the speedo or engine retuner from the underdog pulley changing the idle speed...Any suggestions are welcome.

I like the ride of the Michelins better than the stock Goodyear and it sits a couple inches lower easier for my disabled wife to get into the the truck.

Been trying different shocks, but still like the stock off-road Motorcraft best for a softer ride for wifes bad back.

Thanks for any suggestions on what to do and what not to waste my time on.

JB, oldbaldy454, DAV member, Vietnam era

PS..The "454" is for a 454 Chevy we have ..another fun truck with the classic big block
 
Hey thanks guys for the advice (even though i'm not the OP) but i was wondering what torque rating i should use for the spark plugs? I have a 1993 3.0 V6 ranger XLT
 
I don't have a service manual on the Ranger that shows that spec on torque on the plugs. Maybe the other guys do.

What I have noticed though, after changing the plugs twice in trying two different aftermarket types, on the 3.0 Vulcan heads there are only 3 or 4 threads holding the plug in, so it is almost designed not to ever have the plugs changed, sort of like throw away electronics mfg in China.

The only reason I change mine was that after 75k miles the original owner never changed them, so I was the lucky person to do it. I can see the reasoning of going with OEM stock plugs for that reason (very few threads in head), and some plugs that I have tried did not screw in like the stock plug, so the thread tolerances are sloppy on some of the different brands of aftermarket plugs.

I have noticed that other newer engines are designed the same way, as opposed to engines back in the 70-80's era with more threads to hold the plug in better...
Must be cheaper for the auto makers to tap fewer threads. Be careful !
 
PS> and yes I broke the plug wires pulling them off by the caps...
Another sign that Ford makes them cheap...not designed to be changed
after 6 or 7 yrs of heating and cooling.
So I bought standard wires from NAPA or the local parts store, nuttn fancy
just equivalent to the OEM wires.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top