- Joined
- Aug 19, 2001
- Messages
- 10,904
- City
- So. Calif (SFV)
- Vehicle Year
- 1990
- Engine
- 2.9 V6
- Transmission
- Manual
- Tire Size
- 35x12.50R15
Yeah the Duff drop arm should be fine with the Superlift kit (I have a Rancho arm on mine, a buddy runs a SJ #FA400 arm on his).
As for the Stonecrusher being "superior" to the Superlift (K-link), that may be debatable... As I mentioned, I don't have personal experience with the SC setup, however just by simply looking at it's geometry, it definitely is not "balanced" like the Superlift kit is.
With the SC setup, the driver side wheel will have some toe-in & out bumpsteer inflicted upon it (this due to the d-side's tierod pivot being moved up & down by the p-side linkage) while the p-side itself will have little-to-no toe change. I strongly suspect this is why the SC setup continues to gather some bumpsteer complaints.
The K-link OTOH, while also not ideal geometrically, at least both sides are balanced so that what little bumpsteer it does have tends to be cancelled out by both sides working in unison.
The only practical way to have 'perfect' geometry is with a crossover setup of some sort. However the complexity of it goes way up with a crossover, and to get the proper clearance with the 4WD diff in the way, you most likely would have to put some bends in the linkage (reducing it's strength to some degree). This would have to be weighed with what your needs or requirements are for it (jumping and/or other high-speed use, for example).
As for the Stonecrusher being "superior" to the Superlift (K-link), that may be debatable... As I mentioned, I don't have personal experience with the SC setup, however just by simply looking at it's geometry, it definitely is not "balanced" like the Superlift kit is.
With the SC setup, the driver side wheel will have some toe-in & out bumpsteer inflicted upon it (this due to the d-side's tierod pivot being moved up & down by the p-side linkage) while the p-side itself will have little-to-no toe change. I strongly suspect this is why the SC setup continues to gather some bumpsteer complaints.
The K-link OTOH, while also not ideal geometrically, at least both sides are balanced so that what little bumpsteer it does have tends to be cancelled out by both sides working in unison.
The only practical way to have 'perfect' geometry is with a crossover setup of some sort. However the complexity of it goes way up with a crossover, and to get the proper clearance with the 4WD diff in the way, you most likely would have to put some bends in the linkage (reducing it's strength to some degree). This would have to be weighed with what your needs or requirements are for it (jumping and/or other high-speed use, for example).
Last edited: