James Morse
1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2021
- Messages
- 1,891
- City
- Roanoke VA
- Vehicle Year
- 1997 and 1999
- Engine
- 4.0 V6
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Tire Size
- 31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
- My credo
- The perfect is the enemy of the good.
The '97 looks pretty good. Usually I am all about the Armorall but one thing I detest about it is any over-application that gets on the paint will show and it's a b*tch to get off. Even where it's supposed to go, it can end up splotchy, and doesn't last long. It can end up looking worse and I'm ignorant as to whether it actually preserves anything. So I'm wondering other people's feelings about it.
I have to think they must have garaged it because there isn't the usual shrinkage of window seals, or coating gone from that strip under the window, all the stuff you usually see. I clearcoat-waxed the hood yesterday and it looks like it just came off the showroom new. Ok, maybe not quite, but darn close. They must have got the paint right that year.
Which brings up a whole other issue. On the 99, it's ok, but no show piece. I didn't bother trying to make it one, so I spent zero time on that except a few things. I concentrated on mechanical stuff because given the choice between show and go, I choose go. Didn't worry about door dings, etc. Now I have this nice sharp truck and I'm "wasting" time cleaning and polishing, and thinking about how great it looks on the road, which is vanity. That's a downside as I see it, but it is nice to have a truck that looks good. You know how it is when you have something nice, you (me, anyway) end up parking away from people etc. There are a few small dents. I was thinking of having them taken out, but then I thought, if I make it "perfect" then I'll be going crazy when I see a little ding, so probably better to just leave as-is. The defects are the type you would see close-ups in a Carvana ad etc. That few of them. Maybe one about fifty-cent piece size paintless might get out, that's the only one you really see.
Armorall would make the grey trim darker. Temporarily. But it looks good now, and I'm thinking just leave it alone. It's a lot of plastic trim (wheel well guards, bumpers) and I think I'd end up with it looking worse not better.
Open to suggestions/comments.
I have to think they must have garaged it because there isn't the usual shrinkage of window seals, or coating gone from that strip under the window, all the stuff you usually see. I clearcoat-waxed the hood yesterday and it looks like it just came off the showroom new. Ok, maybe not quite, but darn close. They must have got the paint right that year.
Which brings up a whole other issue. On the 99, it's ok, but no show piece. I didn't bother trying to make it one, so I spent zero time on that except a few things. I concentrated on mechanical stuff because given the choice between show and go, I choose go. Didn't worry about door dings, etc. Now I have this nice sharp truck and I'm "wasting" time cleaning and polishing, and thinking about how great it looks on the road, which is vanity. That's a downside as I see it, but it is nice to have a truck that looks good. You know how it is when you have something nice, you (me, anyway) end up parking away from people etc. There are a few small dents. I was thinking of having them taken out, but then I thought, if I make it "perfect" then I'll be going crazy when I see a little ding, so probably better to just leave as-is. The defects are the type you would see close-ups in a Carvana ad etc. That few of them. Maybe one about fifty-cent piece size paintless might get out, that's the only one you really see.
Armorall would make the grey trim darker. Temporarily. But it looks good now, and I'm thinking just leave it alone. It's a lot of plastic trim (wheel well guards, bumpers) and I think I'd end up with it looking worse not better.
Open to suggestions/comments.