tgallmey
Well-Known Member
Besides the firing order whats different? What kind of ponies should it have?
Last edited:
-
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
5.0: H.O. vs Lopo
- Thread starter tgallmey
- Start date
85_Ranger4x4
Wallows in rivers
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
If if it is a roller, 150hp. Torque is pretty decent at somewhere around 270ft-lb at a pretty low RPM though.
The differences with them and an 87+ HO is that they have E6 heads, a weak cam, non-forged pistons with no valve reliefs. They also had cast iron exhaust manifolds vs the HO's tubular headers and the HO had a better intake.
Basically an HO cam will bring you to comparable specs of an '86 HO, 200hp. In '86 the HO had E6 heads.
It is a case by case deal (I think depending on how much the heads and block have been surfaced) but different heads can get you 25hp+ depending on what they are. E7's were the most common HO head and were rated at 225hp. You have to check valve clearances though.
Without valve reliefs you will have a tad more compression than an HO would have.
The differences with them and an 87+ HO is that they have E6 heads, a weak cam, non-forged pistons with no valve reliefs. They also had cast iron exhaust manifolds vs the HO's tubular headers and the HO had a better intake.
Basically an HO cam will bring you to comparable specs of an '86 HO, 200hp. In '86 the HO had E6 heads.
It is a case by case deal (I think depending on how much the heads and block have been surfaced) but different heads can get you 25hp+ depending on what they are. E7's were the most common HO head and were rated at 225hp. You have to check valve clearances though.
Without valve reliefs you will have a tad more compression than an HO would have.
baddad457
Well-Known Member
The lower intakes are the same between the HO and base 5.0. The truck intake is better than the HO's, these also have the same long block as the HO, sans the forged pistons and cam. This is only true for the 87-92 motors, after 92 all had the same pistons, plus the 94-97 truck/van 5.0 has a shade less cam than the HO, the specs are very close though.
tgallmey
Well-Known Member
I should have a set of E7s laying around but they need new studs. Before I start the swap should I put a different cam in? I want my swap in to be better than the 2.9 It had lol
85_Ranger4x4
Wallows in rivers
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
It is always easier to change stuff in the engine without the engine being in the truck. 
That said I don't think a stock 4.0 would get off too easy trying to keep up with a healthy lopo.
Do check your valve clearances before you get too carried away with it.
That said I don't think a stock 4.0 would get off too easy trying to keep up with a healthy lopo.
Do check your valve clearances before you get too carried away with it.
baddad457
Well-Known Member
E7's didn't have studs. A cam change in it would do wonders. The base roller's specs are pretty lame. The valve lifts are something like .392/.402
Sponsored Ad
Sponsored Ad
TRS Events
Member & Vendor Upgrades
For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.
Recently Featured
Ranger Adventure Video
TRS Merchandise
Follow TRS On Instagram
