Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
well thanks for the offer but im in wyoming. lol. ok so do the explorers do or do not have aluminum blocks. seems like some people say some of them did and some say that all of them do and some say that they were all cast iron. and i would consider a 5.4 but i think they are even wider than a 4.6 dohc so that would cause some issues
Well if space was an issue, a 5.4L would be a extremely tight fit. It was a tight fit when I put it in my mustang.
As far as the heads go, in 99 they put the PI heads on the mustang. If you really want, you can use a 96-98 4.6L block and put the 99-04 heads and cams on it and have about 20 more horses from a stock 99-04 setup.
In my personal opinion, I think you might be asking for problems by putting a 3v setup. Either way either 2v, 3v, 4v, you are looking at a lot of time tuning the truck.
You talking about a 5.0 or 4.6 Explorer? The 5.0 done many times and all the wiring problems been worked thru. With the 4.6, think you would need that Ford stand alone computer and wiring.ok so i should be able to find a wrecked explorer and get the motor out of it and then get the trans and tcase out of a f150.(happen to know where one is) and be set except for the wiring snafus.
well im pretty much decided on the 4.6l. not sure why really im more into the old school stuff but the ideal just intriges me. although i have driven an expedition with the 5.4 and it was really powerful. Just off hand would anyone have the specs to compare the 4.6l and 5.4l. Like the dimension LxHxW for both sizes and head arrangements as well as wieghts for both cast iron blocks and aluminum ones. They didnt make a widely produced cast iron 5.4 did they?