- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- Messages
- 11
- Points
- 3,101
- Transmission
- Automatic
thanks man.
It already has the 35's and 6in of lift. No going back now, just improvement.
It already has the 35's and 6in of lift. No going back now, just improvement.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
thanks man.
It already has the 35's and 6in of lift. No going back now, just improvement.
How does higher RPM equal better mileage? (idk if thats a dumb question)
Depends on engine, your 3.0 should have a 7.5, all 4.0s got 8.8s.What is a stock 95 rangers rear axle? I think its a 7.5 right? If so they dont make a 5.13 for the 7.5
is this mileage after you ajusted for the differance in miles you truck with bigger tires?
Speedo is corrected, yes (well, about 2 MPH fast at 65 still, biggest gear available)
The couple times I broke 24 MPG could very well be due to tailwinds, once was on the I-10 going east out here in San Bernardino Co. Ca. It consistently blows enough there that they got a huge windmill farm out there.
But I also tend to drive a bit on the slow side while cruising (55-60 MPH). I know that much faster than this, the MPG tanks out big-time (probably less than 19 if I keep a sustained 75 MPH).
There are 7.5" 5.13s available, but I would still swap to the 8.8 for the bigger pinion gear at that ratio. The 8.8 from a 4.0L Ranger is a straight bolt-in swap.
edit:
with 30s, 4.10s might bring some improvement, although MPG seems to be a mysteriously variable thing on 2.9s. Why this is I don't know, but it seems I was lucky to get one of the better ones (it did about 26 MPG when I had the dinky P205 donuts and 3.73 gears)
Ok so what would you guess one could get with 5.13 and 35's at 75? And what would be the mileage and power difference if i went with a higher 4.something then the 5.13?