• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

3.0 with 3.08 rear ?


captzemo

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
1
Vehicle Year
1994
Transmission
Automatic
My 94 XLT is starting to rust - thinking of replacing it with a extended cab 3.0 and replacing the 3.73 rear with a 3.08 for better gas milage .
Has anyone else made this change -- what was the result ??
Thanks
 
No, keep the 3.73s. The 3.0 is the most efficient and gets better gas mileage when it's running at higher RPMs. You'd also hate the acceleration with 3.08s
 
Yep...your torque peak is up in four cylinder country.....odds are, if you run the engine at too low RPM when at speed, it's going to lightly load down and the PCM will give the engine additional fuel as it does whenever load is higher.
 
I agree with exbass94 and Hahnsb2. You will get worse gas mileage and NO performance. Stick with the 3.73s or go to 4.11s. Yes it sounds backwards but, it works. The 3.0 loves Rpms and doesn't like to be lugged. Get a set of roller rockers and an underdrive crank pulley. It will have good performance and mileage.
 
x2:icon_thumby: I'd actually go 4.10's (4.11). Best mileage is around the 3,000-3,200 rpm range. No kidding.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top