• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

3.0 getting 11mpg!!! HELP


I have a subaru that was doing that to me. I knew it was leaking but couldn't find out where. Turns out it was leaking from the filler neck in a part I couldn't see from under the vehicle and the leak was so small that it wasn't even dripping, the metal was just weak and porous enough that it would let gas saturate through and cause the smell. Try topping off the tank, jacking it up, and feeling all around in every spot you can reach, if you have a leak your hand will smell like gas eventually!
 
O.K here it goes,according to my owners manual i have a 19.5 gallon tank on my 99 supercab,however i can only put in 14.3 gals or so to fill it after the gauge reads e,and the check gauge light comes on.So i am assuming i have a 16.5 gal.tank installed.I am not the original owner.if i am right i am getting 20+MPG,which is about right.I do not think the truck has a 5 gal. reserve,and the physical size of the tank seems to be right inline with 16.5 gals.Hope this helps.
 
O.K here it goes,according to my owners manual i have a 19.5 gallon tank on my 99 supercab,however i can only put in 14.3 gals or so to fill it after the gauge reads e,and the check gauge light comes on.So i am assuming i have a 16.5 gal.tank installed.I am not the original owner.if i am right i am getting 20+MPG,which is about right.I do not think the truck has a 5 gal. reserve,and the physical size of the tank seems to be right inline with 16.5 gals.Hope this helps.
Guessing your gas millage based on the gas gauge/tank size is a terrible idea. Fill it up, drive 200+ miles, fill up again and divide miles driven by gallons used.
 
Hahnsb2,I have regularly done just as you have suggested,and still come up with 20 or so mpg.what i am suggesting is the possibility that a smaller tank was installed on my truckfor one reason or another. And it is mileage by the way.
 
what hahns said.

truly, you have no way of knowing how much fuel is left in your tank. fuel gauges are not that accurate, plus there is a space in the bottom of the tank below the fuel pickup to prevent your engine from ingesting crap that settles on the bottom...so even when your "out of gas" your not really "out of gas". a station gas fill nozzle shuts off at the same level no matter how much fuel is left in the tank...so you know exactly how much fuel you used between now and the last fill up.
 
Am i to assume that there is a five gallon window here?Be for real here wicked,that is too much.And i repeat i am getting 20 mpg using the 16.5 gal,or fill it from empty scenarios.Any way you calculate it it ads up to my truck having a smaller tank than the owners manual states.
 
sorry, i wasnt debating your smaller tank point. i was just pointing out that figuring mileage based on fuel tank size is VERY inaccurate (you seem to have it down, but it wont work for most people).
 
Thank you wicked,what i was getting at was that matty2170 may be figuring on a 19.5 gal. tank,and he may be getting his erroneus results as a result of that if he has a smaller tank.I do not recall anyone asking that specific question.
 
Yep mileage varies....what do I say?

I've been running a 2000 XLT Ext Cab step side 4x4 with off road package,
245/16 tires, 3.0 FFV V6 with 78,000 miles on it now for about 9 months.
In warm weather and cold, it has been quite reliable, and has never failed.

Mods include:

XP Autolite plugs
Underdog pulley
Flex-0-lite electric fan
Dynomax catback system
K&N filter in stock air box
3" black plastic ABS inlet pipe to throttle body
Dyno boost power chip
MAF sensor enlargement mod

Before the mods, was getting 15-16 with regular 87 gas,
After the mods (but not with the MAF enlargment yet)
got 24 mpg on a few road trips during the warm summer months.
After the MAF mod, the mpg dipped again to 20-21 on the road
due to more air flow. The shift points also changed with this MAF
mod, but seems like it has more punch.

This past winter, for the fun of it I have tried a couple of tanks
of E-85 (since this is Minnesota and where E-85 is plentiful)
for "in-town" stop and go driving at 0 degrees temperature range,
in 4 wheel drive mode when needed, the mileage dropped to 8.5 mpg
on E-85 and about 12 mpg on 87 octane.

After reading the forms again, (as I have not been active since last fall)
it seems like what most are saying about the 3.0 L is true:
its how you drive it, and tire size, rpm and tromping the heck out of it,
all make a difference.
I agree with those that say this engine runs best at 3000 rpm.
Mine purrs at 3000 rpm at 80 mph just fine with the 4.11 axle ratio,
big tires and with the air intake mods!

I considered a smaller tire size, as someone suggested in this forum,
for better mpg, but have not done so due to our snow cover and
nice-to-have ground clearance here in the north country.

Ford was quite stingy with the HP on these small trucks and smaller standard
tire size in most where the smaller engines are designed for, but the bigger
off-road tire size will cut down on mpg with stop & go city driving, for sure !

It still is a fun little truck to drive even if the mpg is bad at times.
We use it a lot for short trip and running errands in town to avoid putting
miles on our other newer vehicles.

I have disconnected the rear drive shaft and even have run it in 4 wheel
drive mode off of the front axle only...it works good that way too with
the Warn Vacuum hubs on this 2000 model. Have used it as a "toad" tow
vehicle for our V-10 motorhome with additional wiring harness for brake lights,
with the switch in 2 wheel drive and rear drive shaft disabled.
What you can't think of ...if you put your mind to it.

Would consider a swap for a 4.0 L/5.0L if it ran as good as this little one does,
but hey, its fun and flexable the way it is!


- JBaldwin, in sunny and snowy southern Minnesota

04 Caddy, 04 T&C, 02 Winne, 99 Chevy 454 dually, 00 Ranger

Enjoy !
 
We have basicly the same trucks, stock 2000 ranger xtl stepside 3.0l

Through out town i can get about 230 out of 3/4 tank

but on a trip to RI...296 miles, i can get there in a little less of 3/4 tank

Is this ussual? or should the numbers be higher????
 
I had a 3.0L 2wd and the most I could ever get out of it was 18mpg. I usually got between 4-11 mpgs though. I couldn't keep my foot out of it.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top