Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
![]()
ugly thing =P nothing of what it was back in the 60's and 70's
What is that thing?
This is what the '10-'11 cars look like...
![]()
Yuk!![]()
![]()
ugly thing =P nothing of what it was back in the 60's and 70's
Reminds me of the new Camaros, big time (not a compliment by any means)
hat I believe was a concept, and also the new one still looks horrid (in my opinion), to the old ones being pretty cool.
In all honesty, the muscle car died out a long time ago, we have sports cars now. =P
only thing i dont like about the 10-11 is the rear design, dunno, the previosu tail lights were better to me
The only Mustang that has ever been close to a "sports car" was the mid-90's cobra with the IRS setup. Even that was so top heavy that it still didn't handle right.
true, the funny thing is the mustangs in 84 used the same engine as the 84 rangers! haha! the 2.8L V6 Cologne! (made in Germany, carb., 3-speed tranny).
What is that thing?
This is what the '10-'11 cars look like...
![]()
Yuk!![]()
This is not what the 2010-2011 models look like. That was a concept from a few years ago, like Ranger Kip stated. I believe this was the Giugiaro Ford Mustang Concept from around 2007: http://www.motortrend.com/future/concept_cars/112_0703_giugiaro_ford_mustang_concept/index.html
That was the Mustang II that used the 2.8L. Calling the Mustang II a Muscle car is on par with calling a 1984 Chevy Nova (Chevette platform) 1993 Pontiac Le-mans (Geo Metro platform) a Muscle car.
I would also like to point out that the Mustang was not originally intended to be a muscle or sports car. It was originally designed as a family car (and the show proto-type was badged "Probe"). Put that in your pipe and think about it.