- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 15,119
- Vehicle Year
- '06, '11
- Engine
- 3.0 V6
- Transmission
- Automatic
Did you double check the spark plug wires at the coil? That has got me a couple times.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
In the past I've found that "DA" ECUs in Rangers were for Federal-RWD-manual. Looking at Rock Auto, O'Reilly, AutoZone, etc, they show the same. O'Reilly's and others show an "RA" as California-4WD-manual.
When I search for F0TF-12A650-DA, it automatically cross references to E9TF-12A650-DA. When I searched for 58-2983, I also came up with a 4.9L. http://www.micro-tech-auto.com/images/pdf/ecmcat.pdf
I'd say it should be an "E8TF-12A650-RA" or, "F0TF-12A650-RA". https://www.autoecmstore.com/products/e8tf-12a650-ra
So the F07F is a no bueno same as the previous?F0TF-12A650-DA
F0 is 1990
T is Light Truck & Bronco <<<< 7 here = Ranger/B2
F is electrical
12A650 is any EEC(Ford engine computer) still used today
DA is the software revision
1990 Ford F-150 or Bronco had inline 6 4.9l, or 5.0l V8 as engine options, also a diesel 7.3l
NO 2.9L for that EEC-IV
F07F is for 1990 Ranger, 7 = Ranger or B2
But could be 2.3l, 2.9l, or 4.0l engine, the last numbers after 12A650 tell that tale
Called Ford dealer to cross reference part numbers. F07F-12A650-DA cross references to FOTZ-12A650-DA
The Ford guy was wrong, FOTZ is a 1990 Ford F-series or Full size Bronco part number and in 1990 they used MAP sensors NOT MAF sensors
Which is why unplugging the MAF has no effect, there is no circuit on pins 14 and 15, they are not hooked up to anything in the computer
The Ford guy was wrong, FOTZ is a 1990 Ford F-series or Full size Bronco part number and in 1990 they used MAP sensors NOT MAF sensors
Which is why unplugging the MAF has no effect, there is no circuit on pins 14 and 15, they are not hooked up to anything in the computer