Some people have been sedated (like me I screwed up my back)
And others certainly don't know.
In this case the clutch to use is either a Centerforce II (NOT their "dual friction")
clutch, these work real well on a 2.9 engine, but in point of fact ANY clutch that
fits a 2.3 also fits a 2.9 or a 3.0 (and Vice-Versa)
So you have that whole selection of clutches to work with...
I've never looked it up but I seem to recall that the 1995-up 3.0 uses
a slightly larger disc (9-1/4 Vs the 8-7/8") than most other "small" clutches.
Personally I had the idea of making a composite flywheel to hang a 4.0 clutch
onto a 2.3 engine. This would have involved modifying BOTH flywheels then
doweling and bolting them together. there was more to it, but... it's moot!
Why is it moot? because the 4.0 flywheel is nearly an inch too big to fit
inside the 2.3 bolt pattern.
So your only option is an aftermarket clutch.
And as mentioned above I personally recommend the Centerforce-II
Thats a very heavy tranny & being that the trans mounting bolts are attached to the aluminum oil pan I would say that the tranny would be to much weight for the oil pan to handle ,plus dont even know if there is a bell housing that will adapt from trans to 4 cyl. & also why would you want to install a granny low tranny into a 2wd Ranger & also elimate having a 5th gear?
well i was looking at if tor towing my boat basicly pulling up ramps and steep inclines but i stated looking at the ratios and according to the specs my first gear has a lower 1st gear than it does so i just guess i will go easy on the clutch. also i didn't know that the bolts went into the oil pan
For
a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting
Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here.
Click the banner to find out how.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.