• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

1993 F150 4x4 4.9L 5spd to Automatic


SCK

Member
Joined
May 27, 2019
Messages
6
City
Ashland City, TN
Vehicle Year
1993
Transmission
Manual
Wondering if Ford offered an Automatic with the 4.9L in-line 6 cyl 4x4?
If so, what tranny was it
 
I don’t know for sure but that year in automatics Ford offered the AOD, E4OD, C6.
 
Yeah, I've seen a few 4.9/auto combos. They were all AOD or AODE. Most were Econolines, but there were a few F-150s.

The C6 was mostly a big block trans.
 
The 4.9l(300) I6 used Windsor pattern, same bolt pattern as small block V8s, i.e. 302/351, so should not be hard to find

AOD was used up to 1993, after that is the AOD-E which needed a computer hook up, but AOD-E was used as earlier at 1992 in trucks and vans, so heads up
1991 and older would for sure be AOD only
 
Last edited:
The 4.9l(300) I6 used Windsor pattern, same bolt pattern as small block V8s, i.e. 302/351, so should not be hard to find

AOD was used up to 1993, after that is the AOD-E which needed a computer hook up, but AOD-E was used as earlier at 1992 in trucks and vans, so heads up
1991 and older would for sure be AOD only

Thanks Ron! I really appreciate your help.
Pull-a-Part here I come!
 
Don't forget flexplate

And starter motor, I think it was different for automatic
 
Don't forget flexplate

And starter motor, I think it was different for automatic

Yes. The cone is longer on the auto trans.

Manual starter won’t engage the flywheel on an auto
 
Last edited:
I’m finding out there are several “additional” items; steering column w shifter, transmission cooler and lines, larger brake pedal, etc..
Is it worth it investing $1k+ in a ‘93? Just asking myself.
 
If you were closer. I’d swap you all my auto stuff from my 95 for your manual stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCK
Maybe a different direction... I’ve been hard on the clutch. I’ve smoked it several times while in reverse when trying to back a loaded trailer.
Would a HD clutch (if there is one) make any difference? I know what all y’all are going to say, “ be easy on the clutch, learn how to drive ?” and so on.
Comments?
 
Luk makes a heavy duty clutch. Seems to work pretty good.

But if you’re going to invest in one good clutch. Look into south bend clutch’s.
 
Luk makes a heavy duty clutch. Seems to work pretty good.

But if you’re going to invest in one good clutch. Look into south bend clutch’s.
I looked at South Bend - they certainly have several options. Knowing nothing about how strength and durability relates to “Foot Pounds”, is the higher the FP the more HD?
Is a HD clutch rated a 240fp harder to engage than one with lower FP?
 
Have you considered just backing it up in low range?
 
The higher the FT-LBS the clutch is rated for. The stronger it will be.

Yes theoretically a heavier duty clutch will be stiffer. But that’s why I like south bend. There clutches are smooth and light.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top