• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Wish we could get this here...


sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
13,837
Reaction score
14,692
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
Apparently not many people want 8' beds any more - for 2024, the only way you can get an 8' bed is with a single cab on the F-150, the extended cab only comes with 6.5' bed now...
Most people don't want to deal with the extra turning radius that a longer wheel base has. Whether we like it or not, most people have a truck as a status symbol and want it to drive like a car or close to it. So, the manufacturers are building to that crowd.
 


85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
33,328
Reaction score
20,460
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Most people don't want to deal with the extra turning radius that a longer wheel base has. Whether we like it or not, most people have a truck as a status symbol and want it to drive like a car or close to it. So, the manufacturers are building to that crowd.
I find a 6.5' bed a nice balance for utility.

My current truck with a crew cab and 6 5' bed is a little long and unwieldy but but I need both the cab and the bed.

Maneuverability plays a role in utility too, if it's a pita to move around it isn't very functional if you deal with tight spaces.

Not to mention a extended cab 8' bed IMO just has odd proportions.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
13,394
Reaction score
8,656
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
I find a 6.5' bed a nice balance for utility.

My current truck with a crew cab and 6 5' bed is a little long and unwieldy but but I need both the cab and the bed.

Maneuverability plays a role in utility too, if it's a pita to move around it isn't very functional if you deal with tight spaces.

Not to mention a extended cab 8' bed IMO just has odd proportions.
Not as odd as a crew with a 5.5
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
13,837
Reaction score
14,692
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
I find a 6.5' bed a nice balance for utility.

My current truck with a crew cab and 6 5' bed is a little long and unwieldy but but I need both the cab and the bed.

Maneuverability plays a role in utility too, if it's a pita to move around it isn't very functional if you deal with tight spaces.

Not to mention a extended cab 8' bed IMO just has odd proportions.
A 6' bed is what I consider a minimum for a useful bed. So, I don't have a problem with that. Manueverability is a thing too.

We have an F250 Supercrew with an 8' bed now and while nice in some ways, it is like navigating a barge. So I can see why people don't want such a long truck. What we really need is one of the crew cab Colorados that is on base but vehicle maintenance refuses to give us one. We either get a regular cab small truck or a Supercrew F250. The F250 fits our needs better. So we don't complain.

I really haven't paid much attention to the newer trucks with the Supercab and a regular bed to comment on the appearance. Older ones look just fine to me.
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
5,018
Reaction score
5,421
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I like the 6.5' bed for daily driver duty. Plenty of useful space to carry large or bulky piles of stuff. 1/2 ton or mid size.

For a dedicated work truck, 3/4t 8' bed minimum. When you go from a 6' bed to an 8' bed don't realize how much easier it makes everything.


For either instance I prefer the single cab, can fit everything I need behind the seat. Any extra space is just going to gradually get filled with junk I can't get at or can't find. Rather have the shorter wheel base and loose the useless space.

Wife has a forester so if I need to go some place with more then one other person I can take that.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
13,394
Reaction score
8,656
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
I like the 6.5' bed for daily driver duty. Plenty of useful space to carry large or bulky piles of stuff. 1/2 ton or mid size.

For a dedicated work truck, 3/4t 8' bed minimum. When you go from a 6' bed to an 8' bed don't realize how much easier it makes everything.


For either instance I prefer the single cab, can fit everything I need behind the seat. Any extra space is just going to gradually get filled with junk I can't get at or can't find. Rather have the shorter wheel base and loose the useless space.

Wife has a forester so if I need to go some place with more then one other person I can take that.
I must be the only person who doesnt find a fullsize with an 8ft bed a massive headache lol.

My F250 is a supercab with an 8ft box with the parkability and turning radius of a friggin oceanliner. But once you get used to 10 pt turns to park its not that bad.

The only time i ever had an issue where it seemed like too much was in a detroit parking garage. So i could see in a urban jungle enviroment it could be hard.

But its awful nice hauling 2 round bales, loads of firewood, etc etc.

In all seriousness though...i notice very few people even use the bed on their truck. Nowadays it seems everyone just uses their truck as sedan with a bed...and instead of actually hauling shit they just throw a trailer behind it.

Ive seen countless 1/2 ton crews, shortboxes, doing "truck stuff"...but only with a trailer attached.

I dont understand it.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,367
Reaction score
14,540
Location
Jackson, NJ. And Manahawkin too.
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Cool, another thread about how a regular cab long bed is the only thing that can be considered a truck.

32243894-D44A-483D-91BD-D1E6276950A6.gif
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
33,328
Reaction score
20,460
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Not as odd as a crew with a 5.5
I know why they did it but moving the rear axle aft with the longbed really doesn't help anything for looks.

I must be the only person who doesnt find a fullsize with an 8ft bed a massive headache lol.

My F250 is a supercab with an 8ft box with the parkability and turning radius of a friggin oceanliner. But once you get used to 10 pt turns to park its not that bad.

The only time i ever had an issue where it seemed like too much was in a detroit parking garage. So i could see in a urban jungle enviroment it could be hard.

But its awful nice hauling 2 round bales, loads of firewood, etc etc.

In all seriousness though...i notice very few people even use the bed on their truck. Nowadays it seems everyone just uses their truck as sedan with a bed...and instead of actually hauling shit they just throw a trailer behind it.

Ive seen countless 1/2 ton crews, shortboxes, doing "truck stuff"...but only with a trailer attached.

I dont understand it.
2 round bales? Dad has a 9' fladbed on his 96 and only has rom for one... "throw a trailer on the back" and you can haul four with an Expedition. Heavy crap like firewood is easier to load in a low slung trailer and usually does double duty. I can sneak it around in trees better with a tractor and then throw it on the truck to go somewhere.

Brush I load both the truck and a trailer because why drag it out, the trailer holds like 5+ pickup loads of brush so I get 6+ pickup loads per trip.
 
Last edited:

RobbieD

2.9l Mafia
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
4,413
Reaction score
4,245
Location
Georgia
Vehicle Year
1984,1990,1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
Toonces drives a Ranger . . . . just not very well.
My F250 is a supercab with an 8ft box with the parkability and turning radius of a friggin oceanliner. But once you get used to 10 pt turns to park its not that bad.

The only time i ever had an issue where it seemed like too much was in a detroit parking garage. So i could see in a urban jungle enviroment it could be hard.
So it's really only a problem in harbors that don't have tugboats.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
13,394
Reaction score
8,656
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
I know why they did it but moving the rear axle aft with the longbed really doesn't help anything for looks.



2 round bales? Dad has a 9' fladbed on his 96 and only has rom for one... "throw a trailer on the back" and you can haul four with an Expedition. Heavy crap like firewood is easier to load in a low slung trailer and usually does double duty. I can sneak it around in trees better with a tractor and then throw it on the truck to go somewhere.

Brush I load both the truck and a trailer because why drag it out, the trailer holds like 5+ pickup loads of brush so I get 6+ pickup loads per trip.
I think the longbox supercabs look good.

And yes two....i usually get 4x4 bales, shut the tailgate and haul ass.

Firewood....i use a trailer too....but i also load the truck bed...

IMG_2118.jpg


I dont mess around :)

So it's really only a problem in harbors that don't have tugboats.
Exactly.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
33,328
Reaction score
20,460
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
i usually get 4x4 bales

I dont mess around :)
Pick one.

Round bales are usually like 5-6' diameter and similar in length. Not these little "fun size" ones you pack around. :icon_rofl:
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
13,394
Reaction score
8,656
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Pick one.

Round bales are usually like 5-6' diameter and similar in length. Not these little "fun size" ones you pack around. :icon_rofl:
I only feed one horse lol.

Secondly, around here 4x4 or 4x5 is pretty standard. Rarely you find bigger then that for sale.

I used to do square bales but round is so much eaiser to deal with...alot less labor intensive.
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Article Contributor
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
6,023
Reaction score
7,378
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.

Uncle Gump

Boomers gotta Boom
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
14,834
Reaction score
15,146
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Today's birthdays

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Rick W
October Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

25th Anniversary Merch

Follow TRS On Instagram

25th Anniversary Sponsors

TRS-3 Ford Ranger Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top