bobbywalter
TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2007
- Messages
- 24,391
- Reaction score
- 5,737
- Location
- woodhaven mi
- Vehicle Year
- 1988
- Make / Model
- FORD mostly
- Engine Type
- V8
- Engine Size
- BIGGER
- Transmission
- Automatic
- 2WD / 4WD
- 4WD
- Total Lift
- sawzall?
- Tire Size
- 33-44
- My credo
- it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
I still say 99% of the problem is user error rather than flaws in vehicle design. Any taller vehicle is going to be more roll over prone than a pancake.
Ford.
Ford engineering....thee engineering team...all of them....with fake burning pinto hell fresh in their tiny little minds..... plainly stated that it was not worth building within its design envelope because it was a dangerous piece of shit.....a few even had the integrity to quit over it.
Like you.... I wholeheartedly totally disagree with them.....and think that it is patently obvious by looking at it that it is a dangerous piece of shit and would drive it accordingly. But...as you can see by the title of this thread....it's just not so patently obvious.
I am very glad ruthless greedy pricks won out and they built them.
I feel bad that this decision also killed hundreds of people because they were marketed to everyone....
As mentioned....they will easily go 85 mph in stock form.. comfortably on a big freeway.. where if you are in a CJ.....you know you are fawking up at about 70..they keep you honest.
I love my bronco....but it's scary here in Detroit....because you have to perform evasive action at a high level in this rush traffic. Young bob drives it the most. And I am always on his ass to drive slow.