Truckspotters

[PetroleumJunkie412]

I just look at everything there is to do and wonder when I'll get it done. Plus, being on long term disability, my finances have changed dramatically from when I started.

I believe it is going well and I'm not one to give up.

The exhaust? I dunno. If 85_Ranger can do it, I can do it. I'm hoping that the 289 manifolds will let me keep the exhaust closer to the engine and the t-case I jave will get the drive shaft further away from the engine. Otherwise....

Stacks out the hood, man!
View attachment 146660

Hood stacks are best option.



Tractor flapper required.

Hood optional.

 

[Curious Hound]

Hood stacks are best option.



Tractor flapper required.

Hood optional.

Flapper?

 

[alwaysFlOoReD]

I have stacks on the intake on my 2.3.I'm trying to figure out a way to have stacks on the exhaust while having the option to switch to regular exhaust out the back.

 

[Li'l Work Truck]

Flapper?
View attachment 146661

That looks like crap.

 

[PlumCrazy]

I just look at everything there is to do and wonder when I'll get it done. Plus, being on long term disability, my finances have changed dramatically from when I started.

I believe it is going well and I'm not one to give up.

The exhaust? I dunno. If 85_Ranger can do it, I can do it. I'm hoping that the 289 manifolds will let me keep the exhaust closer to the engine and the t-case I jave will get the drive shaft further away from the engine. Otherwise....

Stacks out the hood, man!
View attachment 146660

You could save hundreds on tubing by switching to hood stack!

 

[PetroleumJunkie412]

You could save hundreds on tubing by switching to hood stack!

We need to be friends.

 

[Ranger850]

In the case of my 1988: 2, 3, 4, 11

Man, you've been busy

 

[PlumCrazy]

We need to be friends.

You going to be at Carlisle Truck Nats next week?

 

[PetroleumJunkie412]

Man, you've been busy

Yessir, full send.

You going to be at Carlisle Truck Nats next week?

No sir, full send on other crap.