Buddha62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 60
- Age
- 63
- Vehicle Year
- 1988
- Transmission
- Manual
6 or 4cyl???
i have a 88 4wd ranger with a 2.9 thats getting worn out clutch slipping and 1 qt per tank oil leak. but gets 19mpg and sounds like a sewing machine
the 2.9 has a very good hitch and topper but will need a rebuild but decent body
i also have an offer for a 92 4cyl 2.3 extended cab 2wd with a rough body. (needs a new bed) for $300 135k miles (8plugs) it runs good and get better gas milage (about 26mpg)
both are 5 speeds
both will need work and $400-600 dumped into them. i only need 1 truck and will be driving it 130 miles a day. which would be the better truck to have??????
will the 4cyl have enough power to pull a trailer at all??? i would prefer the room of the extended cab.
if both engines were rebuilt which would be the cheaper rebuild and better engine to have??
would the 2.9 still have the oil problem(ticking like a sewing machine)
which would everyone choose?????
Buddha
i have a 88 4wd ranger with a 2.9 thats getting worn out clutch slipping and 1 qt per tank oil leak. but gets 19mpg and sounds like a sewing machine
the 2.9 has a very good hitch and topper but will need a rebuild but decent body
i also have an offer for a 92 4cyl 2.3 extended cab 2wd with a rough body. (needs a new bed) for $300 135k miles (8plugs) it runs good and get better gas milage (about 26mpg)
both are 5 speeds
both will need work and $400-600 dumped into them. i only need 1 truck and will be driving it 130 miles a day. which would be the better truck to have??????
will the 4cyl have enough power to pull a trailer at all??? i would prefer the room of the extended cab.
if both engines were rebuilt which would be the cheaper rebuild and better engine to have??
would the 2.9 still have the oil problem(ticking like a sewing machine)
which would everyone choose?????
Buddha