Bill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,380
- City
- Sacramento, CA
- Vehicle Year
- 2007
- Engine
- 2.3 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Manual
I prefer computerized fuel injection. It works much better than a carburetor at high elevations.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
I prefer computerized fuel injection. It works much better than a carburetor at high elevations.
If my ranger was carburated i wouldnt of had to spend the last 12 mo getting it going.And in the cold. My last carbeureted vehicle, -10*C it was best to plug it in. Below -20, if it wasn't plugged in, you were lucky to get it started. Below -30, if you didn't plug it in, there was no way it would start.
Fuel injected vehicles, even at -40, they were stiff to turn over, but they'd start. Usually first try.
If my ranger was carburated i wouldnt of had to spend the last 12 mo getting it going.
It is for me.Fuel injection isn't that complicated.
Never had a problem with my carbureted engines in the winter. They were neither easier or harder to start that my fuel injected ones. Maybe I have been lucky.
I never did either till this last winter when my 77 sat at the shop 8 hours facing a north wind with -38* temps. Only time ive ever had a carb fail me.Never had a problem with my carbureted engines in the winter. They were neither easier or harder to start that my fuel injected ones. Maybe I have been lucky.
Or you haven't lived in the great white North.