Rotor warpage is a cop-out. It's most likely uneven friction material transfer from improper breakin, which is the cause for 90% of all premature and uneven wear. Different braking systems require different breakin cycles. "Best Practice" for breaking in stock Ford Truck braking systems should go as follows.
New rotors and new pads installed. You should drive the truck to an unused road suitable for highway speeds. Try to come to a complete stop as little as possible until the breakin is complete. Even a slight roll that doesn't register on the speedometer is sufficient. Once at the road of choice, at 60MPH press on the brakes as hard as you can without causing the antilock to kick in. Do not let the truck stop, let off the brakes at 5MPH and keep rolling. Go back to 60MPH and repeat. Do this 6 times. By the 4th time you should be smelling the brakes. Whatever you do, do not let the truck stop rolling. Once the 6 passes of 60-5MPH are complete, run the vehicle at between 35 and 45 MPH for at least 15 minutes as a cool down period. If you upgrade to ceramic pads (which only the lowest temperature rated ceramics should be used on a truck), they require more heat for a proper breakin. With ceramics on a Ford truck with standard rotors you should do 6 passes of 80-5MPH at hard (almost antilock level) braking, immediately followed by 4 passes of 50-20MPH at standard braking and then at least 15 minutes of steady 35-45MPH for cool down.
Stock brakes on all Ford Trucks should average out to 20k miles to 50k miles depending on the region and the driver. Naturally mountainous regions burn brakes up faster, these regional differences are the main reason for the broad average range. But from that you can draw the conclusion that if you live in Colorado and drive hard, you should still see 20,000 miles out of your brakes and if you live in Kansas and drive easy you possibly can get up to 50,000 miles. If you are not getting the lifespan from your brakes, it is likely your breakin process and/or driving style.
Read the information of a professional:
http://www.stoptech.com/tech_info/wp_warped_brakedisk.shtml
The author was a legend so take it as fact. >
http://www.carrollsmith.com/
While your post is techincally correct in some respects you missed that make it all irrelevant in this discussion.
I'll ignore the points that I disagree with
(I prefer a long slow break-in, my last pad swap was just before a trip from Pennsylvania to Indiana, all of it on essentially empty interstate highways.)
Awww screw it.... I'll disagree some more.
You state that "rotor warpage is a cop out"
That presumes (again falsely) that the OP is stating rotor warpage as a CAUSE rather than as a symptom.
what CAUSES rotor warpage?
I've cracked rotors, and I ain't talking about surface heat checking
I'm talking about full penetrating cracks that I could insert a dime into....
when I was still running the split-pin brakes my rotors were usually blue... they'd get hot enough in operation that a colored oxide would form as they cooled.
I've never seen that in the two years I've been running the two piston calipers.
And I JUST replaced my pads for the first time since I installed the two piston brakes.
NOBODY who really knows me really believes that I got a few weeks shy of two years out of a set of pads and rotors...
As one friend asked incredulously: "Are you telling me with a more powerful engine you got seven times the service life out of your brakes?"
I replaced my pads and rotors (and I'll machine the takeoff rotors and put them back on the shelf as ready-for-use spares)
on my truck because I was driving to Indiana to tow another ranger home with me... (you want everything working)
Your worst presumption is that there isn't a mechanical defect...
That wear/Bevel I mentioned above prevents the brakes
from releasing correctly after each pedal application.
the mere presence of that bevel means that even the slightest
contact causes drag and the drag causes more contact... so
the brakes are perpetually running warmer than the drivers pedal
input would justify...
The early brake system has a critical flaw.
The theoretically indestructable steering knuckle is subject to critical wear on that upper thrust surface for the inboard pad.
If that surface is worn the entire knuckle must be replaced.
new ones are unobtanium.
At that point you may as well replace the entire front beam with the 95-97 partsd because pads and rotors are no more expensive than the mid90-94 D35 parts, but the calipers, caliper brackets and pads were used through the end of the 2003 model year.
(I believe the caliper pads and brackets are different 2004-on)
I've actually managed to run my 95-97 brakes at highway speeds
for several hours and coast to a stop in a rest stop get out and still have the hubs be cool enough that they would fail to melt snow off of them
Never saw that happen with the split-pin (83-94) brake system
There are times when I actually have to "warm" the brakes
so they work right.
Hell, I can actually feel the difference in brake performance between
my two different sets of rims
My five spoke (flat face) Explorer rims cool the brakes much more
than the Navajo rims Rims I run my winter tires on.
My new "project" is on a 2004 frame.
Why? even larger rotors
I've run some race compounds from various Ferrodo pads
(including the DS11 compound) to Performance-Friction
Hawk, and even some expiremental Textar compounds
I have seen a "warped" rotor. usually imported cast junk made for STREET vehicles.
Trust me a rotor made in some foundry in China which is likely staffed with slave labor under the supervision of soldiers (prison guards) of the People's Liberation Army can and do warp because of inconsistant casting density.
AD