- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 341
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 35
- Vehicle Year
- 2006
- Transmission
- Automatic
Of course! I would too....Its still an RBV. No point in being a bunch of asses and singling someone out.
If this forum was around in 1989-1990 when Bronco II was phased out, would we have denounced the Ford Explorer as an RBV?
I must say, I do like the 2 door versions that someone posted. That, if only a smaller, would be probably do well in the US.
I agree, its still an RBV, and the two door version does have a nice look to it. it should definitely be allowed access, unless they make it a unibody, front wheel drive, with no 4x4 option. lmao
Another point that is slightly off topic, but that you can go most places, without having the ultimate offroad vehicle. I will not argue that two solid axels are amazing. But my completely stock, one solid axle SLA set up, has taken me everywhere i have ever wanted to go. But with skilled driving, I have no doubt that just because something has 2 inches less travel, or has a sway bar, (IRS), that it is going to be so detrimental. Yes it is a deviation from the solid axel that we have known and loved, but are we really incapable of, technologically, making a IRS that cannot be used as a heavy to medium duty setup. Advancements will be made, and the best thing we can do at this time, is give them some idea's! Let know what we want, and how we want it! / end rant.
