It's my understanding that while not definitive, adding oil during the compression test pretty much rules out any compression loss from above the piston rings if the compression goes up.
				
			
 Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register 
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts. 
Posted by 510ranger:
lets see...-looks in chiltons guide for 91-99 rangers / explorers / mountaineers-
2.3L.......HP................Torque
1991......100 @ 4600.....133 @ 2600
1992......100 @ 4600.....133 @ 2600
1993......100 @ 4600.....133 @ 2600
1994......100 @ 4600.....133 @ 2600
1995......100 @ 4600.....133 @ 2600
1996......112 @ 4800.....135 @ 2400
1997......112 @ 4800.....135 @ 2400
2.5L
1998......117 @ 4500.....149 @ 2500
1999......117 @ 4500.....149 @ 2500
so yes, it changed in 1996, they upped the CR from 9.2 to 9.4:1
In '96 they also changed to a redesigned head with lighter (smaller stem) valves, valve springs and retainers. And reduced the size of the combustion chamber.
Added by pacodiablo:
2000 - 2001 2.5L engines make 119 HP at 5000 RPM and 146 ft. lbs. TQ at 3000 RPM.
I've been searching for used motors the last couple days. I can't find anything remotely good anywhere near here. Of course part of the problem is this is Alabama and more than half of the salvage yards here don't even know how to register their business with the yellow pages let alone google. I have found one possible used 2.5 but I'm waiting for a response on it's condition. I searched for everything from Explorer 5.0 to Ranger 2.3 with little luck.
have you tried car-part.com?

Read all the posts guys and I have had the same problem. I have replaced the MAF, AIT, CPS, TPS, new timing belt and used computer. I am leaning toward CKP as it is what the truck uses for time because there is no distributor. Gonna replace it this weekend and will let everybody know.![]()