Jrdart512
Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2010
- Messages
- 17
- Vehicle Year
- 2000
- Transmission
- Automatic
I replaced all my ball joints on my 2000 4x4 Ranger
Now I used Moog type ball joints pt no. K8695T for the lowers.
My issue is with the lower ball joint. With it installed and torqued to spec and the snap ring installed I can still get movement out of the ball joint housing. The snap ring is sitting above the lower control arm and IF I put a pry bar inbetween the knucle and lower control arm I can move the control arm up to meet and or rest against the snap ring. In doing this I also noticed that the ball joint housing itself where it sits on the underside of the control arm is not sitting flush until I move the control arm.
This is not normal right? I'm wondering IF I should go with the Moog K8695T006, which is advertised as the oversized ball joint?
Hope this makes sense.
ANY insight?
Now I used Moog type ball joints pt no. K8695T for the lowers.
My issue is with the lower ball joint. With it installed and torqued to spec and the snap ring installed I can still get movement out of the ball joint housing. The snap ring is sitting above the lower control arm and IF I put a pry bar inbetween the knucle and lower control arm I can move the control arm up to meet and or rest against the snap ring. In doing this I also noticed that the ball joint housing itself where it sits on the underside of the control arm is not sitting flush until I move the control arm.
This is not normal right? I'm wondering IF I should go with the Moog K8695T006, which is advertised as the oversized ball joint?
Hope this makes sense.
ANY insight?