redneckpunk
Member
Been looking to buy either a ranger or bronco II and came across this one and not sure if it is a good deal. I dont mind having to park it for a while and work on it, just not too familiar with the bronco II's. What I do know is that this vehicle would be primarily used for camping, fishing, etc., and pulling my small 12ft alum. boat (maybe 750lbs).
"1983 ford bronco II,2.8L V6, auto trans, needs work, needs cv joint for rear drive shaft, has an oil leak, needs carb adjusted, registration is past due, last registered 06, it does run and drive"
The ad does have a pic and the body, side shown, is straight. It appears to be sitting on either 33's or 35's with plenty of clearance of fenders so its also lifted(and 4x4). I guess whats throwing me off is the "needs cv joint for rear drive shaft" and "registration is past due, last registered 06". Living in Kalifornia this could be a major project to get smog cert..
So what do you experts think? Also, any pros and cons you can add about this year BII would be of great help.
Thanks in advance
~RNP
"1983 ford bronco II,2.8L V6, auto trans, needs work, needs cv joint for rear drive shaft, has an oil leak, needs carb adjusted, registration is past due, last registered 06, it does run and drive"
The ad does have a pic and the body, side shown, is straight. It appears to be sitting on either 33's or 35's with plenty of clearance of fenders so its also lifted(and 4x4). I guess whats throwing me off is the "needs cv joint for rear drive shaft" and "registration is past due, last registered 06". Living in Kalifornia this could be a major project to get smog cert..

So what do you experts think? Also, any pros and cons you can add about this year BII would be of great help.
Thanks in advance
~RNP