• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

I'm considering doing a dumb pointless swap in the future. Talk me out of it lol


GalaticFartic1159

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2025
Messages
4
City
oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1993
Transmission
Automatic
Honestly, no idea why this came to mind, but it did. I had the silly idea to yank the 2.3 out of my Ranger and putting in an older engine, maybe a 2.9L into it. In my tiny mind my truck is a 1993, Last ones with the 2.9 were built in 1992, surely it'd be possible.... Right? I highly highly doubt it, but has someone else done it? "Why, why would you *ever* want to do this? Of all engines you'd pick a 2.9?" idk, why the heck not, my poor old 2.3 has a tick and leaks oil from... Everywhere. "Turbo 2.3 swap it" true, but where's the fun in that when you can put a dumber stupid poopoo doodoo engine in it? I can't think of any think more fun than to gut the entire engine bay and rearrange it for an even older motor! 😁👍
 
If i was gonna do something out of the ordinary. Maybe a 300 inline 6 would be different.
 
too bad you cannot get a mazda 2.5 to fit in there. those engines are freaking rock solid and have some power in the mazda3 and mazda6
 

Well... Swapping to a doodoo poopoo motor is dumb...

If you wanna be unique though.. the link gets you a motor AND a 6mt, along with an incredibly amusing exhaust note.. one infinitely better than the garbled mess an old v6 makes..
 
Stay 4 cylinder is the best choice, the truck is already set up for it. Rebuild the 2.3L, maybe hop it up a little with camshaft and compression bump. If you're feeling a little crazy, swap in a 2.5 from a later 90s Ranger, it's the same engine platform. If you want to go a little wild, forced induction on either of those. Maybe look at a gear swap if you want better performance out of it.

If you're going to swap to a V6, 4.0L is only logical consideration. The cost is practically the same unless you own the 2.9L drivetrain already. It is the same amount of work to swap the 2.9L and 4.0L. The latter is newer, more powerful, more reliable, and pretty much as good on fuel mileage. The good thing about either is that it can be a bolt in swap with pretty much all factory parts. Swapping in an older engine just isn't worth it, not to mention illegal per federal law. Per federal law, the engine must be same year or newer and retain the engine's emissions equipment. Of course if the vehicle is not in an inspection zone or is exempt, who is going to know.

The good thing about any of those is that they can be a bolt in swaps using all factory parts. You can get everything you need from a donor car and/or junkyard. Easily supportable through your local auto parts store.

V8 swap is pretty much the same amount of effort as a V6 to install, but isn't as much of a simple bolt in. An Explorer 5.0 drivetrain is a fairly easy swap into most Rangers, though the wiring can be a challenge if you want to keep the EFI. Being a first Gen you will need to change oil pan and pickup tube to clear engine cross member, IIRC Mustamg double sump works. Will require custom engine mounts, some body modifications to make it fit, might need a custom driveshaft. You will want headers that fit in the frame (stock ex manifolds suck) and exhaust to support it. That also means more money, and maybe more time, to put it in there.

When it comes to long term viability of engine swaps, being unique is not a bonus. I know that somewhat contradicts a thread I just created about swapping my F-100. IMO an old chassis with stock(ish) engine, is better than a newer chassis with an older less supported drivetrain. In that situation you're going in knowing that both are old and not well supported and everything is designed to work together. An old chassis with a newer engine is better than both, old style and supportability of a modern drivetrain.
 
Being a first Gen you will need to change oil pan and pickup tube to clear engine cross member, IIRC Mustamg double sump works. Will require custom engine mounts, some body modifications to make it fit, might need a custom driveshaft. You will want headers that fit in the frame (stock ex manifolds suck) and exhaust to support it. That also means more money, and maybe more time, to put it in there.
OP has a 3rd gen, he has a 93, but this may still apply because he’s still TTB/TIB front.

Definitely headers on a 5.0, those Explorer exhaust manifolds…geeze, it’s a wonder they can run being that throttled…
 
Definitely headers on a 5.0, those Explorer exhaust manifolds…geeze, it’s a wonder they can run being that throttled…

I would avoid the GT40P heads if you want to do headers...
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top