85_Ranger4x4
Wallows in rivers
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS Event Staff
💻 TRS Socials
Article Contributor
TRS Event Participant
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
OTOTM Winner
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Banner 2010-2011
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 35,341
- Points
- 2,001
- City
- Frankfort
- State - Country
- IA- USA
- Vehicle Year
- 1985
- Engine
- 5.0
- Transmission
- Manual
If there is a packed base under the mud (like a sloppy road) skinny tires will be fine, deeper mud and you probably don't want to cut down there only to find nothing is there.
Correct... Load Range E doesn't mean ten ply... I could see an F-350 sinking faster than a Ranger with most any tire, think about the weigh difference in the two... If you're going to stay on loose sand or deep snow wide tires would be better, but for most everything else skinnier and taller is better, ever wonder why Land Rover Defender/Series, Landcruiser, most every other off road light trucks always came with 7.50r16 or 235/85-16's?
Pretty much the same thing I said.
For soft stuff flotation is where it is at, a tactic everything from riding lawn mowers to tractors to bulldozers employ.
I don't think 235/85-16's come from the factory on any rig lighter than a 3/4 ton in the US... and a base one at that.