- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,733
- Vehicle Year
- 02 06 and 2012
- Transmission
- Automatic
Lets get one thing straight, I'm not a Ford hater but this one is trying my patience. I bought it used at the end of '08. At that time it had, for all practical purposes, no rust. Within a year a rust hole developed in the bed. I figure its just bad luck and weld that hole back up (after dismounting the bed, etc.) and put a paint on bedliner on.
This year the spare tire about fell off when the carrier rotted out. More bad luck I guess, that also drops the gas tank canister and causes the "check engine" light to come on.
So I ended up spending ~$150 to get a new spare tire carrier and about 2 hours cleaning it up (the anti-rust goo Ford used on it is pretty pitiful and dissolves with gas) and repainting only to discover it can't be installed in one piece. 3 more hours had the pan split and tabs welded on so it can be installed in two pieces and joined back together.
Also I've noticed where the rear brake hardline joins the soft line that goes to the axle theres a mount that rivets to the frame, thats rotted off too... Ford says the part is not available. Thats all added to the gas tank strap mount which is rotted off and "not available". Oh I almost forgot, the only other body rot is the gas tank door which is rotting from under the paint... Ford wants ~$100 for one unpainted.
So anyway I'll also say the dealership guys treated me nice enough but the parts I want are unavailable. I'll try another dealership but if the parts don't exist I don't know what they can do. Musick17 is right, I'll probably end up making one, I was just hoping (since I've spent way too much time on this stupid truck) that somebody had one.
Finally adsm08, 10 years old is NOT an old truck. I drive an '84 Mercedes 110 miles every single day. Are you suggesting that in 2003 Ford's rust prevention techniques are not as good as Mercedes from 20 years previous? That sucks. My '96 Dodge Dakota had no serious underbody rust at 222,000 miles when I traded it for the Ranger. If the transmission and transfer case in the Dodge hadn't been giving up I'd have kept it. The Ranger is a better woods truck but the Dakota v8 had more power (no surprise), got just as good gas mileage (wait, what?) and rode better down the paved road.
Sorry about the issues you had, Bro!! Glad it was not something that could have harmed you or another person!! I have family and friends that work for Ford and believe it or not...not all of them drive Fords. I am a Ford man but just not going to buy any new ones. My brother-in-law (my wife's side of the family) works up in Ohio at a Ford assembly plant and has been there for right at 30 years. He does not own a Ford (some Ford man huh?) He drives a really super neat looking Dodge Dakota 4 door V8 4x4 with 35''s on it. They drive it down here once or twice a year to visit. His wife drives an 09 Escape, so there is a Ford in the family. He likes the older Fords and has had a few Mustangs years back. He's like me..he likes older Fords. Nothing wrong with that...somebody has to buy the used cars and trucks...right?? lol