• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Front brake upgrade ?s


41Ranger

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
9
City
Arkansas
Vehicle Year
1941
Transmission
Automatic
In Sticky post on front brake upgrades a response says:

"To upgrade an '83-88 2wd requires swapping the entire I-beam
(Ford changed the balljoint setup going into 1989) with the steering knuckles etc. On an '89-94 Ranger (or '91-94 2wd Explorer) you can simply replace everything outboard of the balljoints."

What exactly changed? Was it the whole ball joint configuration, or just the size?

If it is just the balljoint itself, it may be interchangable with a newer ball joint. I'm new to the ranger thing, but on a fox body Mustang the balljoints can be swapped for a 98 and newer balljoints to mount the new style spindle with upgraded brakes. Is there any reason this same concept would not apply? Did the suspension change completely?
 
Braking system was not drastically changed for rangers til 95, thats when they went dual piston calipers and larger pads...I'd get the beams from a 95-97 ranger...
SVT
 
In Sticky post on front brake upgrades a response says:

"To upgrade an '83-88 2wd requires swapping the entire I-beam
(Ford changed the balljoint setup going into 1989) with the steering knuckles etc. On an '89-94 Ranger (or '91-94 2wd Explorer) you can simply replace everything outboard of the balljoints."

What exactly changed? Was it the whole ball joint configuration, or just the size?

If it is just the balljoint itself, it may be interchangable with a newer ball joint. I'm new to the ranger thing, but on a fox body Mustang the balljoints can be swapped for a 98 and newer balljoints to mount the new style spindle with upgraded brakes. Is there any reason this same concept would not apply? Did the suspension change completely?


Ball Joint configuiration, the '84-88 Beams have the balljoints pressed into the beams and the taper that the stud engages is in the knuckle.

In 1989 this was reversed, the balljoints are pressed into the knuckle and the taper is in the beam.


Braking system was not drastically changed for rangers til 95, thats when they went dual piston calipers and larger pads...I'd get the beams from a 95-97 ranger...
SVT


I think he got that point, I'm left thinking you really should read "the sticky" immediatly before responding to any questions about it, otherwise your answers seem "Dis co NE cTed".

The "upgrade" brakes used on the 1995-97's won't fit his beams and he's very specifically asking why.

Granted he could have phrased the question a bit better but the point is about asking why the '95-97's WILL for the '89-94 beams but NOT the earlier beams.
 
Last edited:

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top