sgtsandman
Automotive Technician
TRS Forum Moderator
⭐Supporting Member
TRS Event Participant
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS 25th Anniversary
VAGABOND
U.S. Military - Veteran
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2017
- Messages
- 16,712
- Points
- 601
- City
- Aliquippa
- State - Country
- PA - USA
- Vehicle Year
- 2019
- Vehicle
- Ford Ranger
- Drive
- 4WD
- Engine
- 2.3 EcoBoost
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Tire Size
- 265/70R17
- My credo
- Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong. Plan for it as best you can.
I don't have any first hand experience with the Maverick to say yes or no but I do with the 2019+ Rangers.The newer Rangers are just too big for me to considered them Rangers. They are the size of late 90's early 00's F150s. Hell even the Mavericks are bigger than my Ranger.
What you say is true and not at the same time. After shoehorning the 2011 Ranger and the 2019 into my small garage, there is a difference but it is not a huge one (about 6" longer). I can walk around the front, or the rear of the 2011 (I have to choose one or the other) with the problem. It is a bit tight but there is no side stepping. With the 2019, I have to side step. The width of the 2019 is a bit larger for sure but it is not a massive difference. The rest is optical illusion because of the high belt line and tall bed sides.
Driving experience wise, there is no perceptible difference to me as far as parking, navigating through parking lots, traffic, and on trails. Granted, I've driven a lot of vehicles from tandem passenger buses to tiny two door Chevy Sprints, so it is possible that I'm just so used to automatically adjusting that I don't even notice it anymore.
A far as comparing the 2019 to an earlier F150, you are probably right. With the way vehicles have been plus sized over the years, I would not be the least bit surprised if the 2019+ Rangers are pretty much the same size.

