• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

First photos of Maverick


I like the idea of driving the sports car for curiosity.

For everyday driving, I'd rather have a truck.
I actually did enjoy driving the Ranger as a DD for the year or so that I did, even with the automatic. I still drive it regularly just because I like it - the thing handles much better than I ever expected. Still, I love small performance cars, and I'm able to enjoy that while getting twice the fuel economy. And the Ranger is there when I need a truck.

Beyond that I'm not racking up the miles on an old vehicle now.
 
I soak popsicle sticks in urine.
 
Land yachts from the 70's still had shitty handling, piss-poor brakes, and often no headrest or not adjustable. Numb steering. Lap belts only in the back seat. No airbags. No ABS. No rear sway bar, front was a toss-up. Small tire footprint compared to today, and far worse tires even if they were radials. Minimum weight of two tons, and did I mention they had shitty brakes?????

None of those things makes it unsafe. I would not hesistate to drop one on the expressway at 70mph and roll all day. People logged millions of safe miles without nannies everyone thinks they "need"

Safer? Sure, probably 0% fatality rate in collisions..... if you kept them under 30 mph. Maybe 40. Over that, hit something solid enough, snap your neck.

Once again...what i said. In a single vehicle high speed crash against a solid object...yes. Anything else youll fare damn good.

Stay in the right lane, slow, with one or the other blinkers on... or both.... you'll fit right in, in south Florida in the winter, Rusty..... :p

You know how many nights ive ran 45-50mph in a snowstorm driving my 77 F250? With no ABS, shitty steering, no nothing and have been perfectly safe? Battled numerous michigan winters in a 1st gen 2wd ranger with zero mishaps? Its about the DRIVER.

Love my Ranger (well B4000) but I have to remember, it seems to have twice the braking distance as my Mazda 3, and far worse handling. But the Ranger handles like a DREAM compared to a Ford Granada that I had to drive to high school. That was a real POS.....

Dont drive your ranger like your mazda and youll be fine. Thats what im getting at here. Vehicles (old or new) being deemed "unsafe" because you had idiots used to 7feet wide, 20feet long, 4500lb station wagons with 3 inches of ground clearence hopping in a bronco II, rolling it, then claiming its unsafe. So the OEs had to start basically mounting a truck body on a car chassis and it ruined the truck/suv market for anyone who wanted a real truck/suv. Instead of saying "its your responsibilty to drive it as intended".
 
None of those things makes it unsafe. I would not hesistate to drop one on the expressway at 70mph and roll all day. People logged millions of safe miles without nannies everyone thinks they "need"

Once again...what i said. In a single vehicle high speed crash against a solid object...yes. Anything else youll fare damn good.

You know how many nights ive ran 45-50mph in a snowstorm driving my 77 F250? With no ABS, shitty steering, no nothing and have been perfectly safe? Battled numerous michigan winters in a 1st gen 2wd ranger with zero mishaps? Its about the DRIVER.

Dont drive your ranger like your mazda and youll be fine. Thats what im getting at here. Vehicles (old or new) being deemed "unsafe" because you had idiots used to 7feet wide, 20feet long, 4500lb station wagons with 3 inches of ground clearence hopping in a bronco II, rolling it, then claiming its unsafe. So the OEs had to start basically mounting a truck body on a car chassis and it ruined the truck/suv market for anyone who wanted a real truck/suv. Instead of saying "its your responsibilty to drive it as intended".


"none of those things make it unsafe" - till you HIT something. Then it's terribly "unsafe". Good luck trying to dodge someone who veers into your lane, or whatever. I guess if you run over someone else, and kill them, no big deal. Wouldn't want it on my conscience if the POS I was driving caused someone else to die, but that's just me. Look up the death rates, per mile driven, in the 70s.

Keep your shitty 70's junk. My ranger gets WAY better gas mileage than the Granada did (and the Granada wasn't a particularly large car for the era), STARTS (in cold weather!!!!!) and I don't have to mess with distributor caps and rotors. Or replace the exhaust every few years because it rots out (still on the original 97 exhaust system).

Like I said.... south Florida.... roads are straight, flat, weather is warm, and you NEED to drive the most massive, steel-cage vehicle you can, to keep from getting run over by the "headless" Lincolns and Caddys being driven where the driver is looking UNDER the steering wheel :eek: OK, there, I just found a circumstance where your vision of automotive heaven exists :p Frankly if I ever moved back there, I'd get an old school bus, or a dump truck, for a daily driver (think I'm kidding but I'm not). Between the Caribbean island natives driving 20mph in the rain with their hazards on, the drug dealers running from the cops, and the snowbirds who shouldn't be on the roads, anyway....
 
None of those things makes it unsafe. I would not hesistate to drop one on the expressway at 70mph and roll all day. People logged millions of safe miles without nannies everyone thinks they "need"



Once again...what i said. In a single vehicle high speed crash against a solid object...yes. Anything else youll fare damn good.



You know how many nights ive ran 45-50mph in a snowstorm driving my 77 F250? With no ABS, shitty steering, no nothing and have been perfectly safe? Battled numerous michigan winters in a 1st gen 2wd ranger with zero mishaps? Its about the DRIVER.



Dont drive your ranger like your mazda and youll be fine. Thats what im getting at here. Vehicles (old or new) being deemed "unsafe" because you had idiots used to 7feet wide, 20feet long, 4500lb station wagons with 3 inches of ground clearence hopping in a bronco II, rolling it, then claiming its unsafe. So the OEs had to start basically mounting a truck body on a car chassis and it ruined the truck/suv market for anyone who wanted a real truck/suv. Instead of saying "its your responsibilty to drive it as intended".

And which car did they swipe the very strong/rigid fully boxed frame from that allows them to do far more than trucks in the past could do?
 
IDK... if I came walking around the corner into the living room and some jumped out yelling “boo”.

I tried that, your door was locked!
 
Finding your house to be full on, Martha Stewart decorated.

Crisp curtains, Colonel furniture, plastic wrapped couches, and table runners with doilies. Lots and lots of doilies.

:popcorn:

20200927_110820.jpg
 
Here ya go, Rusty. "Proof positive" that 1970s cars were BY FAR the safest ever invented, and the safety nannies are a bunch of worthless losers. Or maybe not. On the other hand.... if we were all still driving 1970s crap, we'd have run out of oil by now, and there'd be NO fatalities, since everyone would have to walk.

Public transportation fatality rates are much lower, maybe we should all drive busses???? Hmmm..........

I started at 1950, it's even more frightening in the 1920s, 30s, and 40s.

 

Attachments

  • fatalitiesperyear.JPG
    fatalitiesperyear.JPG
    47.7 KB · Views: 203

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Overland of America

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Our Latest Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top