kevm14
Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2008
- Messages
- 14
- Vehicle Year
- 1991
- Transmission
- Automatic
I thought I'd make a new thread since this is a more specific topic than my other one.
I replaced the thermostat and water pump and flushed the heater core recently due to what I thought was a water pump leak. I think it was actually a T-stat housing leak but at least those are replaced now. I used a brand new Napa pump and a Motorcraft thermostat. I have been experiencing poor mileage and since the dash gauge reports a seemingly low temp, I bought a new ECT sensor and gauge sender, as well as an O2 sensor to compliment the thermostat and make sure everything is working correctly.
I also got lucky and found an EEC-IV interface cable for my Autoxray XP240 (that I bought refurbished for $90 a million years ago for use with my OBD-I GM). Tonight I hooked it up and scanned the truck (it's a 91 2.3L btw) and I want to discuss my findings. Here is a list of what I saw as well as questions:
1. The dash temp gauge doesn't seem to indicate any hotter since replacing the thermostat indicating that engine coolant temp is about the same as it was before (i.e. prior stat was operating). It indicates right on the left line of the normal range when up to temp, which I interpreted as "too cold," spawning my cooling system maintenance episode. I used a Motorcraft RT-1140 if anyone wants to double check. I believe it should be stock temperature (~190+ opening temp).
2. After full warmup, and while driving on the highway, engine temp never climbs above ~171°F as reported by the ECM (from the ECT sensor). It fluctuates between 165 and 173. Since the dash gauge reports the same (low) temp as before I replaced the stat, I assume the engine was running at this temp on the prior stat. I may still replace both the ECT and temp sender just to be sure. Perhaps the thermostat housing is corroded enough that the rubber gasket on the thermostat can't fully seal because the surface is rough, causing internal coolant blow-by to the radiator. Is this a common problem? I'm talking about this guy: http://info.rockauto.com/getimage/g...http://info.rockauto.com/Motorcraft/rh-35.gif
3. Possibly due to the low reported temp (which may or may not be true coolant temp), I did not see any EGR operation and the ECM seemed to fall out of closed loop, even while driving down the highway. One or both of these (plus the enrichment from a reported cooler engine) could easily be the cause of the poor fuel economy.
4. The scantool shows me intake air temp in volts, not degrees, so does anybody have a conversion chart to determine if that sensor is working correctly? It seemed to run about 3 volts while driving down the highway and I have NO idea if this is even warm or cold. I did notice that when I sat idling the voltage decreased, suggesting that higher volts is cooler, which makes sense. The voltage was about 3.2 at startup which means the factory intake does a decent job getting cool air in there. Or this sensor is also malfunctioning, which would lead to possible false fuel enrichment.
5. TPS actually seems to be working properly, reporting 0.9V at closed throttle, which I think is right. However, the previous owner told me the A/C stopped working while he owned it and one of the things the scantool tells me is the state of the Wide Open Throttle A/C Cutout. Interestingly, it said "Yes" and never said anything else no matter what I did. I would have thought the ECM would control the A/C compressor relay based on TPS voltage but perhaps there is an independent switch? If so, where is it? That could be the only reason the A/C doesn't work, which would be neat.
6. I can't tell the state of the O2 sensor since the update rate from the ECM data stream is too slow but I'm going to replace it with a Motorcraft just to be sure. I wish they would have outputted long and short term fuel trims, not just O2 voltage. Even with a faster data stream update rate, O2 voltage by itself is of limited use.
So that's it I guess. If anyone can help me address these I would greatly appreciate it. I'm an engineer and I have to have this thing running at its optimum!
I replaced the thermostat and water pump and flushed the heater core recently due to what I thought was a water pump leak. I think it was actually a T-stat housing leak but at least those are replaced now. I used a brand new Napa pump and a Motorcraft thermostat. I have been experiencing poor mileage and since the dash gauge reports a seemingly low temp, I bought a new ECT sensor and gauge sender, as well as an O2 sensor to compliment the thermostat and make sure everything is working correctly.
I also got lucky and found an EEC-IV interface cable for my Autoxray XP240 (that I bought refurbished for $90 a million years ago for use with my OBD-I GM). Tonight I hooked it up and scanned the truck (it's a 91 2.3L btw) and I want to discuss my findings. Here is a list of what I saw as well as questions:
1. The dash temp gauge doesn't seem to indicate any hotter since replacing the thermostat indicating that engine coolant temp is about the same as it was before (i.e. prior stat was operating). It indicates right on the left line of the normal range when up to temp, which I interpreted as "too cold," spawning my cooling system maintenance episode. I used a Motorcraft RT-1140 if anyone wants to double check. I believe it should be stock temperature (~190+ opening temp).
2. After full warmup, and while driving on the highway, engine temp never climbs above ~171°F as reported by the ECM (from the ECT sensor). It fluctuates between 165 and 173. Since the dash gauge reports the same (low) temp as before I replaced the stat, I assume the engine was running at this temp on the prior stat. I may still replace both the ECT and temp sender just to be sure. Perhaps the thermostat housing is corroded enough that the rubber gasket on the thermostat can't fully seal because the surface is rough, causing internal coolant blow-by to the radiator. Is this a common problem? I'm talking about this guy: http://info.rockauto.com/getimage/g...http://info.rockauto.com/Motorcraft/rh-35.gif
3. Possibly due to the low reported temp (which may or may not be true coolant temp), I did not see any EGR operation and the ECM seemed to fall out of closed loop, even while driving down the highway. One or both of these (plus the enrichment from a reported cooler engine) could easily be the cause of the poor fuel economy.
4. The scantool shows me intake air temp in volts, not degrees, so does anybody have a conversion chart to determine if that sensor is working correctly? It seemed to run about 3 volts while driving down the highway and I have NO idea if this is even warm or cold. I did notice that when I sat idling the voltage decreased, suggesting that higher volts is cooler, which makes sense. The voltage was about 3.2 at startup which means the factory intake does a decent job getting cool air in there. Or this sensor is also malfunctioning, which would lead to possible false fuel enrichment.
5. TPS actually seems to be working properly, reporting 0.9V at closed throttle, which I think is right. However, the previous owner told me the A/C stopped working while he owned it and one of the things the scantool tells me is the state of the Wide Open Throttle A/C Cutout. Interestingly, it said "Yes" and never said anything else no matter what I did. I would have thought the ECM would control the A/C compressor relay based on TPS voltage but perhaps there is an independent switch? If so, where is it? That could be the only reason the A/C doesn't work, which would be neat.
6. I can't tell the state of the O2 sensor since the update rate from the ECM data stream is too slow but I'm going to replace it with a Motorcraft just to be sure. I wish they would have outputted long and short term fuel trims, not just O2 voltage. Even with a faster data stream update rate, O2 voltage by itself is of limited use.
So that's it I guess. If anyone can help me address these I would greatly appreciate it. I'm an engineer and I have to have this thing running at its optimum!
Last edited: