• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

differentiel ford ranger


That I am aware of, none.

The Rangers came with a 7.5 inch rear end as standard equipment from 83 to 2011, and had an optional 8.8 inch rear end from 1990 to 2011.

According to the shop manual the 2019s are using a Dana M220.
 
I didn't think they ever did, if so it would be with 4cyl engines only and might just be 1983

As far as I know Rangers only ever used 7.5" and 8.8"
 
I didn't think they ever did, if so it would be with 4cyl engines only and might just be 1983

As far as I know Rangers only ever used 7.5" and 8.8"

I didn't even know Ford made a 6.75 until about five minutes ago. From what I can find on the Google it would appear that axle was only used in 4-cylinder Mustangs from 79 to 93.
 
That is a listed code for Rangers, 74 is a 6.75" with 3.45 ratio

Never seen one in a Ranger :)

Not having seen one I can't say if the spring perches will be the same as the 7.5" and 8.8" I would think they would be because the frame should be the same

Measurements for the 7.5/8.8 are seen here: https://therangerstation.com/tech_library/Ford-7_5-axle.shtml

The 1983-1992 rear axles were all the same width, 1993 and up are 2" wider which are fine to use, tires just stick out 1" more on each side

If spring perches are the same then a swap to a 7.5/8.8 wouldn't be too hard
 
Last edited:
3.45 gears behind a 4cyl would suck. If you get another rear end I would go to 3.73 or, if you can find it, 4.10 gearing. It will make that 4cyl feel much peppier and won't hurt mileage...probably help if its mostly city driving.
 
wath the difference between equalock and traction lock?

Check these links that came from the tech section, bookmark the 1st one for reference;



 
3.45’s are awful, forget about using 5th gear and it feels like your pulling a 2000# trailer-uphill. 4.10’s are a good choice, theres not much fuel milage diffrence but youre not working the engine as hard and you do have the ability to put on some bigger tires. 3.73’s arent bad either and you can get high 20’s mpg easily. Could be worse though, Ive heard of a 3.08 ratio-wouldnt want that, esp with a 4 cyl.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top