In my ranger I am running a 1998 GT-40P 5.0 motor with a 2000 ECU.
The ONLY thing that I had to change for the 2000 ECU was the CPS Sensor had to be a 2 wire one, not a 3 wire, so I bought a brand new one from autozone, and simply popped the sensor off, ran the wiring accordingly *Found diagrams, ran it/soldered it correctly as the 00 Harness would have been* and drove it. I found that the truck had a bad mis under partial load between maybe 2 and 4K RPM, We adjusted (see rotated) the sensor by 'ear' *Just listening to the motor and reving to see if it was breaking up* and now it drives fine with no CEL for it. I am fairly confident this is not the 'correct' way to do this, and I know this affects fuel timing, and not ignition.
I know with the 3 wire sensor, you can 'align' it with a voltmeter, so I have 3 problems...
A) Is the CPS Spindle the EXACT SAME for the 96-99s as it is for the 00 and 01's (The sensor attaches the same way, but is the physical gear driven spindle the same?)
B) If it is the EXACT SAME, is the alignment tool *CPS Alignment tool, I've seen it mentioned a few times* the same for 96-99 as it is for 00-01's?
C) If it is all the exact same, why did my truck have a mis-fire with the factory 96-99 Alignment when switching to the 00-01 2 wire sensor. When I FIRST did the swap, I was using a 96 ECU with the 3 wire CPS, and it ran fine *Albeit EXTREMELY rich because it was set for return fuel system so it was 'dumping' gas, but it didn't have any misfires*
Is it possible because the 96 ECU was defaulting to 'limp' mode because of the fuel system and thats why I never felt a miss before?
Thank you in advance for any help guys, Truck pulls like a freight train minus its gearing/traction issues (4.10 posi with OEM 14 inch 'bubble' 4 cylinder tires)
________
Kawasaki KH100
The ONLY thing that I had to change for the 2000 ECU was the CPS Sensor had to be a 2 wire one, not a 3 wire, so I bought a brand new one from autozone, and simply popped the sensor off, ran the wiring accordingly *Found diagrams, ran it/soldered it correctly as the 00 Harness would have been* and drove it. I found that the truck had a bad mis under partial load between maybe 2 and 4K RPM, We adjusted (see rotated) the sensor by 'ear' *Just listening to the motor and reving to see if it was breaking up* and now it drives fine with no CEL for it. I am fairly confident this is not the 'correct' way to do this, and I know this affects fuel timing, and not ignition.
I know with the 3 wire sensor, you can 'align' it with a voltmeter, so I have 3 problems...
A) Is the CPS Spindle the EXACT SAME for the 96-99s as it is for the 00 and 01's (The sensor attaches the same way, but is the physical gear driven spindle the same?)
B) If it is the EXACT SAME, is the alignment tool *CPS Alignment tool, I've seen it mentioned a few times* the same for 96-99 as it is for 00-01's?
C) If it is all the exact same, why did my truck have a mis-fire with the factory 96-99 Alignment when switching to the 00-01 2 wire sensor. When I FIRST did the swap, I was using a 96 ECU with the 3 wire CPS, and it ran fine *Albeit EXTREMELY rich because it was set for return fuel system so it was 'dumping' gas, but it didn't have any misfires*
Is it possible because the 96 ECU was defaulting to 'limp' mode because of the fuel system and thats why I never felt a miss before?
Thank you in advance for any help guys, Truck pulls like a freight train minus its gearing/traction issues (4.10 posi with OEM 14 inch 'bubble' 4 cylinder tires)
________
Kawasaki KH100
Last edited: