4x4 v8 Ranger
- Thread starter simonsays
- Start date
Just picked up a new sponsor, rcv performance!
Got the Rcv joints installed! They are so smooth no u joint shimmy at speed anymore. Strapped at 24.5in of travel.
Got the Rcv joints installed! They are so smooth no u joint shimmy at speed anymore. Strapped at 24.5in of travel.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,059
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Medford, Oregon.
- Vehicle Year
- 1996
- Transmission
- Manual
So you aren't selling it now?
Its still for sale. I was planning to do this anyways as part of the sale, as well as new seats and some other minor details to finish cleaning it up.
so we dynoed the truck today..
any guesses on #S
No FB cheaters!!
remember
347 v8 10.25:1 91 octaine
5spd manual
4.88 gears
35in muds
Very restrictive headers. but very open exhaust
from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
any guesses on #S
No FB cheaters!!
remember
347 v8 10.25:1 91 octaine
5spd manual
4.88 gears
35in muds
Very restrictive headers. but very open exhaust
from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 15,630
- Points
- 3,101
- Vehicle Year
- '06, '11
- Engine
- 3.0 V6
- Transmission
- Automatic
Without looking back in your build, I'll guess 412. I guess I'm going to "waste" a few hours reading your build thread. It looks interesting from this end of the time line.
Richard
Richard
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,271
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Nevada
- Vehicle Year
- 1987, 1989
- Engine
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 6”
- Tire Size
- 35
325
These are rear wheel #s not crank #s
The Dyno ended up breaking 2 pulls before mine. They did some work to temporary fix it for the rest of the day. After talking with the guy who was in front of me yesterday said after fixing it correctly they can tell the numbers are low because they retested the Truck that was in line before me, once it was fixed and it came up with much higher numbers.
Looks like I'll need to retest it.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
The Dyno ended up breaking 2 pulls before mine. They did some work to temporary fix it for the rest of the day. After talking with the guy who was in front of me yesterday said after fixing it correctly they can tell the numbers are low because they retested the Truck that was in line before me, once it was fixed and it came up with much higher numbers.
Looks like I'll need to retest it.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- Messages
- 2,023
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Port Huron, MI
- Vehicle Year
- 2011
- Transmission
- Automatic
In the neighborhood of 360?
I'll give you a hint, the race Truck has 275 HP at the crank and it only puts down 124 HP 188 torque to the ground. 400HP to the ground would mean I had like 550-600HP
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,271
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Nevada
- Vehicle Year
- 1987, 1989
- Engine
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 6”
- Tire Size
- 35
So it's a stroker and only puts that out? That's a lot of money for a gain of only 50hp.
The race Truck has a stock 302. The Prerunner is the one with the 347 we just dynoed, I was giving the numbers of the race Truck to let everyone know how far off they are in guesses. The 347 is putting out a lot more hp then the 302 and nearly double the torque.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,271
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Nevada
- Vehicle Year
- 1987, 1989
- Engine
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 6”
- Tire Size
- 35
Oh ok I gotchya.
Sponsored Ad
TRS Events & Gatherings
Recently Featured
TRS Latest Video
Official TRS Merchandise
Follow TRS On Instagram
