Correct. They need their pay AND benefits cut dramatically to get down to a reasonable level.
Cut the pay down to $14/hour starting, with a 401(k) matching plan. Kill the pensions and everything else, except include a barebones health plan that has a high deductible. I think this is a very generous pay package for someone who has only a high school diploma at best. And Ford would be back on the field to compete.
And the pensions and medical of retirees needs to be cut. That's a HUGE cost, and it was forced unfairly on Ford by the unions in the 80s.
I know that this sounds extreme, but the other alternative is that all the jobs are lost. The current pay/benefits package simply isn't sustainable...it's not even close.
		
		
	 
Every dollar Ford does not pay the working class is a dollar that is effectively removed an already weak economy.  If Ford and all other employers do as you suggest and mindlessly push costs down by slashing wages and benefits, all of the working class will sink even further into poverty and there will be no one left to purchase Ford's products.  So Ford's decision to cut workers' pay is ever-so-slightly more complex than what will save the company the most money up-front.
As far as the dead-horse argument that unions are the problem, quit repeating that crap you hear on TV.  If unions are really the problem, why is Toyota struggling too?
The harsh reality is that nobody sitting in a job interview somewhere else cares what Evan of the TRS forums thinks is fair compensation.  Employers are trying to argue pay down while employees are trying to argue pay up.  Unions successfully argued their pay up through force of sheer numbers of workers.  Yeah, higher education is nice, but a degree won't make you sprout an extra set of hands.  You'll have to hire manual labor at some point for some jobs, and if you want a functional economy you have to pay them a living wage.  To refuse to do so leads to the mess we have now: nobody has the money to purchase the goods those companies want to produce, so those companies are failing.  None of that has anything to do with anyone's arbitrary notion of fairness.
Does it strike anyone else as a catch-22 that because you do not have any higher education you don't deserve benefits and wages that may make such education affordable?  College isn't free, you know.
I'm curious.  You said, "Ford would be back in the field to compete," if they did as you said.  What do you mean?  How much do they need to save on benefits and wages to compete?  Compete vs. who?  What are their wages and benefits?  The 401(k) matching plan you specified, match up to what percentage?  What's your vestment schedule?  Hell, what investments could you make with the employees' plans in today's market that would pay off at all?  Where would you cut it off, and how much money do you expect to save that way?  So, you start employees off at $14/hour, but how do you doll out raises?  Is there a cap?  Will you cap vacation and sick days?  If so, how do you determine what these caps ought to be?  You thought this out, right?  You didn't just list off some arbitrary "solutions" you heard on TV, did you?
How does a union go about forcing things unfairly?  If the employers have the right to withhold pay raises and benefits because they think it's necessary, do the employees not also have the right to withhold their labor for their own reasons?  If the employers don't want to deal with the unions' demands they do actually have the right to cut all of them loose and do the work themselves.