- Joined
- Feb 15, 2020
- Messages
- 6,714
- City
- Southern maine
- State - Country
- ME - USA
- Vehicle Year
- 1996
- Vehicle
- Ford Ranger
- Drive
- 2WD
- Engine
- 2.3 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Drop
- Shackle flip
- Tire Size
- 235/60/15
- My credo
- Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
What advantages does that 20 year old ranger have that make it worth paying MORE money than a new Maverick with a full warranty?
I don't know

What COULD be considered advantages though.. the ranger is smaller, has more bed room, insurance would be cheaper, replacement parts are plentiful and would be cheaper, manual transmission, its not a brand new model.. so it won't be plauged with new model problems, way less electrical/techy than anything '21, and the thing is an absolute specimen from what you can see in the pictures.
I bet that thing will age another 20 years better than a Maverick will age its first 20.