- Joined
- Nov 20, 2001
- Messages
- 3,800
- Points
- 5,101
- City
- Wayne, PA
- Engine
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Tire Size
- 42
I'd get a double cardan joint at the tcase end and not worry about the angle of the pinion. Better ground clearance this way
-
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Onthetrailto - 1993 2.3t SAS project
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2024
- Messages
- 17
- Points
- 101
- City
- Tallahassee
- State - Country
- FL - USA
- Vehicle Year
- 1993
- Vehicle
- Ford Ranger
- Drive
- 4WD
- Engine
- 2.3 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 4
- Tire Size
- 31
- My credo
- "The idea of wilderness needs no defense, it only needs defenders."
Looking at double cardans online, for a few bucks more I can get a complete driveshaft with double cardan and a center slip yoke with 1310 u-joints. That would save me the fab work and balancing. Just need to get the correct length.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2001
- Messages
- 10,036
- Points
- 5,101
- City
- Dayton
- State - Country
- OR - USA
- Vehicle Year
- 1990, 1997
- Drive
- 4WD
- Engine
- 2.3 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 6
- Tire Size
- 35"
What would be the best way to do a slip yoke eliminator on the front output? You wouldn't want two slip joints... I would imagine it would be a pain to drill/tap that, I guess you could plug weld something on but I would think that would be last resort... I'm covered in spare parts for me but am curious as I might consider it on the 4406 on my Explorer rear output someday...
Sponsored Ad
Sponsored Ad
Event Coverage
TRS Events
Member & Vendor Upgrades
Become a Supporting Member:
Or a Supporting Vendor:
Recently Featured
TRS Latest Video
TRS Merch
Follow TRS On Instagram
