pillen140
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2008
- Messages
- 3,263
- Age
- 39
- City
- winston-salem, NC
- Vehicle Year
- 1995
- Transmission
- Manual
ya, da paint pry jus slo u down, unless u use glossee.![]()
???

Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
ya, da paint pry jus slo u down, unless u use glossee.![]()
da paint jes slose u down, unless he use glossee.![]()
I would have to say acura TL 00-08
you obviously havent seen a lot of rangers!
is kind of different though. my friend is building an amc eagle on a toyota pick up frame! (little does he know about the frame recall!)
I wouldn't mind trying out one of those 2004-2006 GTOs. My brother was a salesman at a Pontiac/GMCs dealer and they flew him to drive Pontiacs and GMCs. He said he was afraid of that car while he was driving it.
400hp, 400ft#--that's NET, not GROSS. That's a friggen machine.
12.9 second 1/4s at 108mph stock with a 4.6 0-60.
That whomps any previous time by a GTO badged car.
And an Australian import.
Know what? I think I like that car too.
I ment it will out wheel a ranger bout the same size. Also that car was all subrau frame an drive line. It was bulit at a local shop near me that speshalized in off road. You could set your open beer on the dash an bomb it down an it wouldnt spill it was so smoth!!! No lie! I miss that car bad (and its 30mpg)![]()
yuck! a honda with different badges.but everyone has different tastes! but if some one gave you a choice between an acura and a ferrari, you would take the acura?
besides the fact that Honda's are designed with a part failure rate 10x lower than any other manufacturer, my brother in law replaced his Q45 with an Acura something. 300hp out of a 3.5 liter. It's stupid fast. I drove it. It has a dual mode shifter. You can pull it up to slap shift it or leave it down to let it do it's own thing. It pulled as hard as my 472" '64 Galaxie did--on a lot less than half the displacement. That car is nuts considering it's so damn nice.
The Q45 was a beast too, by the way. Bigger though. But a sweet aluminum 4-valve V8. You guys are just lucky they cost $50,000 and that you need a trust fund to afford them. If unreasonable people like you drove them you would be getting your V8 Ranger asses spanked every day. You have no idea what some of these luxury brands are packing under the hood.
besides the fact that Honda's are designed with a part failure rate 10x lower than any other manufacturer, my brother in law replaced his Q45 with an Acura something. 300hp out of a 3.5 liter. It's stupid fast. I drove it. It has a dual mode shifter. You can pull it up to slap shift it or leave it down to let it do it's own thing. It pulled as hard as my 472" '64 Galaxie did--on a lot less than half the displacement. That car is nuts considering it's so damn nice.
The Q45 was a beast too, by the way. Bigger though. But a sweet aluminum 4-valve V8. You guys are just lucky they cost $50,000 and that you need a trust fund to afford them. If unreasonable people like you drove them you would be getting your V8 Ranger asses spanked every day. You have no idea what some of these luxury brands are packing under the hood.
I recamend ot anyone if you get you hands on any old subrau 4x4 mainly from the 80s. Get it an ropm it off road! Ive had many stock subees on my small farm. You might suprize your self! Verry fun!!!!!!!!!!
BEAT this!!! By far this was my favorit car! It out wheeled my ranger but lacked on power. Its a 91 Subrau GL wagon. It sported a Legesy 2.2 4 pooper an had the tranny out of a older subee with High an Low. It ran 30-9.5 tires an had a locked rear.
![]()
Thats how we roll in east CT kid!