Doorgunner... I hear you and know what your are saying though that's not what I meant. Actually thinking about it, I'm not sure if I even know what I meant. I do expect everything you describe, that it is that it will be beyond my wildest dream.
RustedRanger you mentioned Daniel 9:26 which says after 62 sets of 7. In the both the NIV and King James versions of the bible I have before me it alludes to "sevens" being weeks. You on the other hand say it means sets of 7 years. This will be a period of either 62 weeks or 434 years, but that is after what? After 70 weeks or 490 years. When does this period start? I have not read all of the book of Daniel and do not have time to do so currently, but I see nothing in that that tells us anything about when the end of times will be. It seems to tell us how long it will take once it begins, but does not tell when it will begin. It also does not say that he will be killed, but cut off as in lost to the people.
Christ provided a list of events which would generally alert us when the time was near -- and, basically, those events seemed to have occurred. (1) "The leafing of the fig tree," Matthew 24:32-33, would have been the re-establishment of Israel in 1948. (2) "The abominable destructive thing on holy ground" would have been the installation of nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles by Israel in the 1980s. (3) "Woe" -- a threat, not words of pity -- "to pregnant women and nursing mothers in those days," Matthew 24:19, seems to single out the Pro-Choice Movement itself as an End Times sign. (4) "It will be like Sodom in those days," a reduction of Luke 17:28-30, seems to refer to the 2003 Supreme Court decision striking down laws against sodomy, and growth of homosexual marriage. Finally, (5) Paul's assurance at 2 Thessalonians 2:3 that "the apostasy" or "great falling away" must come first seems to refer to current collapse of church attendance.
I know of the list of events, but I don't see how we can begin to judge what could and could not qualify as those events. As had been said in this thread numerous times, people have "predicted" the end many times over the years, especially religious people, in particular the one who came up with this date. Don't you think that they had some justification for those events as well. I highly doubt that all of them are the same as those you mention, especially numbers 3 and 4.
1) Leafing of the fig tree? Dude it's not referring to Israel being re-established. It's an analogy. You watch for the leafing of the fig to know when summer arrives. Likewise watch for the events preceding the coming of the son of man, when they have happened you know the time is near.
2) A "nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles" is the sign of the beast? I kinda doubt that. What happened to the seven years of peace. To my knowledge, granted my memory of history is a little rough, that hasn't happened yet.
3) Where did you come up with woe being a threat? It could easily be descriptive of a condition. In fact it is usually used to describe someone suffering, or who will be suffering. The context in which it is used in these verses, Matthew 24:15-25, seems to suggest this. It seems to be speaking of fleeing, and and how bad it will be for women who are with small children or who are pregnant.
4) Luke 17:28-30 (King James Version):
28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;
29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
I can't see where a supreme court decision in 2003 had anything to do with this. Instead it seems to suggest that it will start out a day like any other.
5) I think this is the one you are probably closest to right on. But I also do not think this it has to do with "church attendance" so much as a loss of belief, or faith, in Christ. This can not be represented by Church Attendance. I would also like to ask where do these church attendance numbers come from? In the many years I attended the same church I never heard anyone calling roll from an attendance roster. Neither did any of the other churches I have visited. I can also say that that church steadily grew the entire time I attended and has continued to do so since I left. They went from having a single service with a sanctuary half full, to two services (and sometimes three) with it full, and last I heard are in need of a bigger sanctuary to fit everyone. Regardless of which it is referring to I think it probably has a lot further to go before it reaches the levels being talked about in that verse.
I'm not trying to attack you, but I can't stand people who take things lines like those out of context and try to twist them to their will. You can't read one verse, or part of one verse, without taking into account the verses and chapters before and after it. As Christians we get irritated by non-Christians who do that, we shouldn't be doing it ourselves, especially not to each other.
On that note since you referenced 2 Thessalonians 2:3, I would like to reference you to the verse just before it:
King James:
1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.