Everyone says EFI outperforms carbs. I just dont see it.
An EFI engine runs cleaner, but thats it. Also, ill give alititude changes to EFI. Past that, IMO, its a wash.
Its to each their own.
A carb coats the whole inside of the intake with air/fuel mix, and that's lost thru evaporation when engine is shut off, ain't much but ain't 0 either
Fuel injector just coats head's intake port, so maybe 10% loss versus 100% loss.
A carb uses vacuum/air flow passed the jets to meter fuel, so when you decelerate, high vacuum, fuel is sucked in(idler jets) but does nothing.
(common practice with carb engines was to shift to Neutral while coasting down a long grade, so just use idle level fuel)
Fuel injection computers shut off fuel injectors when decelerating, so better to leave them in gear while coasting down hill, no fuel use.
(computer does add fuel now and then while decelerating to keep Cats Hot)
Yes, fuel injection is more adaptive to altitude AND Temperature so better running and fuel savings if you live in an area with larger temperature swings between winter and summer and also if you take trips that require higher and lower elevation driving.
And yes, lower emissions simply because they are more efficient in air/fuel mix and use.
Can you tune a carb to make more power than fuel injection, no, not if you tune the fuel injection as well, apples to apples, use a screwdriver or a computer
Can you tune a carb to get better MPG than fuel injection, no, the above mentioned things prevent that.
So no real debate on which is "better", but what you LIKE to use is a personal choice, and in that respect some LIKE carbs better