This site cracks me up. It's a site about a Ford Ranger...a light duty smaller pickup. Yet so many people are talking about towing big loads, hauling large items, and how if a truck rides nice, is comfortable, and can haul your family that somehow it's not a "real truck".
It's like trying to frame a house with a ball peen hammer. It's not the fault of the hammer, it's the fault of the carpenter for choosing the wrong tool. It's like judging a fish's athletic ability by how well it can climb a tree.
Amen.
What I want to tow comparable midsize trucks are rated for. Actually they are rated to tow more than my '02 5.4 F-150. I don't do it often or far but having the option is kind of a personal requirement. Since the competition can do it I don't think I am too far out of line.
There is such thing as the free market. It's a wonderful thing...and it never fails. If there was a profitable market for a small stripped down truck with an 8' bed that could haul 10,000lbs and sell for $20,000....trust me...the market would provide it. Fact is, that's not a profitable product.
Look at the demographics. There are a lot of farms and a lot of farm land in the United States. Now look at population density of a rural area versus a suburban area. If you're a marketing guy....who you gonna build a truck for?
Fun fact, farm trucks are often written off on taxes as a "farm expense" and since they would just have to give it to the govt anyway many are loaded. Low grain prices have put the kabosh on a lot of that recently but when times were good guys would buy a loaded truck, bump their 2yo truck to their beater truck and trade in their 4yo truck on the new one. Repeat two years later.
We have one guy that didn't get the memo and bought a third superduty last year for a farm expense and now can't pay us for his farm repairs, but moving on...
I am Ford's target market. I live in a rural area. I have the need to haul a motorcycle, to haul things like brush or old appliances. I enjoy camping and hauling damp gear, camp stove fuel, tables, chairs, and such is much easier OUTSIDE of your vehicle that you have to drive around daily as it gets pretty cruddy...especially if it rains. An 8ft bed is not required or desired....the truck has to fit in my garage. I've hauled two motorcycles in a Honda Ridgeline and it worked just fine. No need to shut the tailgate. If you know how to properly secure a motorcycle, it's not going to fall out.
Because I'm a working stiff and in no way rich, it's not economically intelligent for me to have two vehicles I have to upkeep, insure, and store...I need one vehicle that offers me a great commuting and road trip experience WITH utility that a pickup truck provides. I may need to pull a small utility trailer that's a couple thousands pounds. I want reasonable fuel economy. And I need to be able to wash it up and haul around business colleagues and not be embarrassed when I have to pull up at the valet when I'm having a date night with the wife.
I can relate, I also live in the country but I have snow to deal with on a gravel road. Day to day I do more gas can type hauling than lumber. When we had two dogs my extended cab was tight for trips to the inlaws, won't get any better if we start having kids.
There is a reason SUVs and trucks are outselling cars these days. It's because there are a LOT of folks like me out there. In 2.5 years I'll be handing down my vehicle to my daughter when she turns 16. Then I'll be buying a truck. Which one I haven't determined because I've not driven a Ranger yet. The Tacoma is too small inside. The Colorado/Canyon is nice, but are missing a few features I want unless I spend $42k...which I won't be. Nissan is a joke.
I'm penning my hopes on the Ranger.
When I looked at the one in Detroit I would peg the room about the same as a Taco. We were not allowed to sit in them though. Rear legroom looked similar to a first or second gen Explorer which isn't huge but what many of us that grew up in the 90's had to live with in the family truckster.
I really do not care for the interior on the GM twins. Looks really cheap/boring and the gauges are set down by the front bumper I think, visible by very deep tubes. I heard a diesel one last week, I was kinda surprised it actually sounded like a diesel. I kinda like that, I know it would bother some.
When we were in Detroit I tried to check out the GM twins and the Taco because it would be the only time I would get to see them and a Ranger at the same time for a year or better.
How I like the Ranger all centers on the center console. If it is obtrusive it will fail. I would rather not even have a full length console. I hate how confining many center consoles are, give me a split bench with a nice flip down console any day.
A lot of guys rag on the Toyota powertrain (car engine and indecisive automatic trans) but having not driven one I could live with the base carcass of it.