pictures please

[89DANGERANGER]

now seeing some pics im thinking maybe......3'' body lift. then slap the 32s on there and then adding a leveling kit with 2'' blocks in the back. 5'' lift with 32s. sound good?

 

[Rammunition360]

yeah dude my 83 2x4 runs 245 70's

 

[88ranger2.95sp]

My exact setup . Ranger #2 has a 3" body lift, 3" blocks in the rear, and stacked, welded washer coil spacers (~1.5") in the front. ~5" lift. Running 32x10.50 swamper radials, I have no rub on anything, even at full stuff and full lock. My D28 Ujoints hate that. No pics tho; I don't have a digital camera. Hope this helps.

Rob

 

[MudSlutII]

89 ranger with 3" body lift and 33s my friend....

 

[89DANGERANGER]

89 ranger with 3" body lift and 33s my friend....

looks exactly identicle to mine. do the 33s rub on the radius arms? i know the 33s on my bronco do but its stock. do u have a 2.9 or a 4.0 i have a 2.9 but i still want ok gas mileage.

 

[MAKG]

Just so you know....you can fit 31's on that generation RBV with no lift at all.

Might as well save the headaches.

 

[Tpenner93]

93 ranger stock no lifting required 31x10.5x15

 

[89DANGERANGER]

ok. if i was to get the 33s....would they fit on a 7'' wheel? i still have stock wheels. and for some reason...my front end sita higher than my rear on my ranger. just by a tad bit. is this bcuz of old shocks and springs or something else. it doesnt have a leveling kit

 

[Kona]

Short answer NO , long answer NO the tire deforms to much and it is a bitch to get them on and off and most tire shops will not even consider it.

 

[89DANGERANGER]

so a 32s the biggest to fit on a 7'' wheel. gotcha.
i would get 31s but i just dont see them doin as well. they are kind of small.