ZSK
Well-Known Member

The 3.0 has its following but it's a smart move for Mazda to eliminate it simply because of numbers.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Long live the mighty Four point oh liter
ones things for sure my OHV doesn't get close to 22mpg daily like my 3.0l does, and its DEFINATLY doesn't get 25 on the highway like my 3.0l does.People are getting defensive over nothing.
All four of the engine families used in the Ranger have been reliable. Ford isn't discontinuing the 3.0L and the 4.0L due to quality issues. The fact of the matter is they are outdated engines. The Vulcan goes back to the mid-80's. The Cologne goes back to 1968 when it was originally a 1.8L, which came from a V4 built in the early 60's.
At this point there is no reason to keep the 3.0L around. Performance of the 2.3L is just shy of the 3.0L, without the weight of a cast iron block (I think the Duratec is 40lbs lighter than the Lima). If you want to get technical about it, the specs are on Mazda's website. 143hp vs 148hp / 153ft lbs vs 180. After driving both, the 3.0L is a little better with the air conditioner running and they are both sluggish under about 2200 rpm.
I think the big complaint about the 3.0L is the fuel economy, which is only slightly better than the 4.0L, but only has a little more power than the 2.3L. After comparing the fuel economy, most people would weight in the 1-2mpg difference with the extra power the 4.0L has, and choose the 4.0L if the feel they need the power, or choose the 2.3L if they want the fuel economy.
The replacement for both the 3.0L and the 4.0L will be the Cyclone family, which is the Duratec 35 and 37. The Duratec 37 is the one that will be going into the F150's. 3.7L and 270hp. Half of the people reading this would probably kill themselves if they had a 270hp engine in their Ranger.
If you guys dont care about power, go buy an suzuki samarai.
Aren't the duratecs mazda/mazda design engines? If so, I want nothing to do with them. I had more problems with my b2200 engine wise than I could count. Additionally, aren't the duratecs considered Non-rebuildable? Again, I don't really want antyhing to do with stuff that isn't MADE to last.
Funny... I have a 2.5 Lima in my truck, and I haul lots of crap with my truck without any problem.
Now the 3.0 has been around for awhile. To me it makes sense to keep it around as a base engine and to use it in cars...It never really was a truck engine, but nither was the Lima, or the 2.9, or the 2.8....they all like to be wound up a little.
I'm guessing that just about every Ford engine will be a duratec before long?
i'm just tired of good solid reliable designs being replaced with stuff that hasn't really proven itself.
The 3.0 may be slow, but it's bulletproof. I have RARELY had a 3.0 equipped Ford come in for work at my shop. With Rangers, all I get are 4.0 and 4cyl trucks. .
What is it about the American public and power? My 3.0 turns my 32" A/T tires with 4.10s perfectly fine. Whatever happened to a truck being a truck and not a sport sedan? ..
Look at all the clapped-out 15-20 year old Tauruses running around. Can't kill 'em.+1
3.0L is THE most reliable engine Ford has put out for years.