human5
Well-Known Member
I like the first one. Although, it looks like a Frontier. Really rugged looking too.
The second one looks like a Tacoma and pretty weak looking.
The second one looks like a Tacoma and pretty weak looking.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Aerodynamics isn't for speed, its for mileage. The car companies have to produce cars with better and better mpg nowadays and the only way to do that as we still use our 100 year old internal combustion engine technology is to make things flow better.
Aero is not the only way to improve fuel econ. Below 45mph you could basically be driving a cube and it wouldn't get any worse mileage than a vehicle with a Cd of .3. Reducing weight is one of the best ways to increase econ. Granted on a 4x4 that is a bit more difficult. But the manufacturers are stuck between a rock and a hard place. The American consumer being the rock. The consumer wants all the stupid little features and still get better fuel econ. Individually these features seem insignificant but they all add up to a lot of weight.
Hybrids aren't the answer to our problems either. It think of hybrids as bandaids.
Here's the Rangers offered in Australia < < clicky
They seem to offer them in more flavors over there.
areo doesnt' due much till ya hit 70+ and by 80 ya start losing mpg.
So much so that they have sactioned fuel econ competitions on city streets. They all drive their hybrids or homemade contraptions at roughly 29mph no matter the speed limit.
Looks too much like the Chevy Colorado, although, I would still drive it before I drove the Nissan Frontier looking pile in the first picture, or the Tacoma resembling turd in the second picture. Damn Japs.Here's the Rangers offered in Australia < < clicky
They seem to offer them in more flavors over there.