General Grabber AT or Firestone Destination AT

[bobsleder251]

Grabbers, like said before, really similar to Bfg. Mine have worn very evenly, im too lazy to rotate tires regularly but they all look brand new after 15,000 miles. and they have great traction in sand and dirt.

 

[onemeanranger]

BFG's would be nice but with your two options i would probably go with the firestones over the grabbers

 

[JohnnyO]

I ordered Firestone Destination A/T's today. My bud's tire shop may actually have them in tomorrow. I elected to stay with the stock size, but it's a bit of an oddball with not a lot of selection. 245/65-17.
I don't know if they're on sale or what, but the price he quoted me was $30 less each than what he told me 6 months ago.
I didn't remind him.

 

[johnboy13]

Yea i believe that I'll be getting the Firestones. I'm not off the road too much other than during deer season. And even then, the wranglers did decent for where I have to go (sand) so I'm sure any tire will be better than those. Firestones will probably be quieter and more comfortable than the grabbers on the highway which I do alot of. Thanks for the input guys!

 

[JohnnyO]

I can report so far that my Firestones are pretty quiet for an all-terrain.

 

[ssj123]

if you are definitly going with either the grabbers or destinations i would go with the grabbers. i had a set of the grabbers on my old jeep and they were awesome. as far as the guys saying the bfgs in my opinion id still go with grabbers cause im running the bfgs right now on my ranger and i must say even though you cant deny the quality of a bfg tire for the price difference the grabbers are a better bang for the buck.

 

[johnboy13]

Thanks for all the input fellas. I ended up with the Destinations. 255/70R16. Look great, quiet, responsive and they ride so much better! I decided to go with these because I do more highway driving than anything so I figured the Grabbers where more aggressive than I needed. Thanks again guys.