- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 230
- Age
- 63
- Vehicle Year
- 1998
- Engine
- Transmission
- Automatic
- My credo
- Hey ya'll, watch this
I use my tomtom everyday. You cant beat it for the price.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
I use my tomtom everyday. You cant beat it for the price.
I've got a Garmin....Nuvi 2xx, I think. Durn near threw it out the window the other day, though. Needed to get to a bridge, for work. Didn't have an address, just a town name, route number, and bridge number. Couldn't make the thing give me general directions toward the town without a specific address...and I didn't have one.
Which is why I rely first and foremost on these:
![]()
About the only thing I think the GPS is genuinely better than a map for is finding a specific address in a city area. Other than that, I hardly ever stick it on the windshield.
Travel more. You won't think that way.
Well...I suppose, literally, you're right. The Maine atlas doesn't do me a whole lot of good outside of Maine.
I've traveled enough, and used GPS enough, to know that GPS simply does not give me the results I want for long-distance (or even medium distance) navigation. Period. It's a useful tool, in certain situations, and thus remains in my pickup, but I've driven cross-country twice with just paper maps and wouldn't hesitate to do it again. I'd dread such a trip with nothing but a GPS.
As I said, where the high-tech option has the edge is in cities. I hate cities, and avoid them whenever possible, though.
I'm just the other way around. I can handle the cross-country part, but the GPS is irreplaceable for guidance once I get to my destination. I don't think twice about launching for a drive to Detroit, or Chicago, or Huntsville, or Omaha, with just a GPS. I've done it enough times to know that, while it may not find the absolute optimal route, it won't lead me astray.I've traveled enough, and used GPS enough, to know that GPS simply does not give me the results I want for long-distance (or even medium distance) navigation. Period. It's a useful tool, in certain situations, and thus remains in my pickup, but I've driven cross-country twice with just paper maps and wouldn't hesitate to do it again. I'd dread such a trip with nothing but a GPS.