engine mount: rubber vs hydraulic replacement


scotts90ranger

25+ Year Member

Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
10,435
Points
7,601
City
Dayton
State - Country
OR - USA
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Drive
4WD
Engine
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
Napa has a stock replacement hydro mount for and a rubber non OEM Certified replacement. I figure the rubber might be stronger than the hydro unit, but was wondering if anyone had any experience with the rubber one? the rubber one is like $10 less... I'm open and just curious, would like to do something better than the stock POS like the leaf spring bushing type, but would rather just bolt it together quick since it's just the passenger side that broke and the drivers side looks like a complete PIA, so I'll just make up something to restrain it from taking the whole tension load...

anywho, thanks for any input
 
well my drivers side broke a while back and i asked my dad the same question. The rubber ones are pretty solid, just hope you dont have a problem with a little shaking.
 
I could care less about vibration, this thing's far from pristine and cozy... and at 170K on the clock, it's seen better days :)

I figured the rubber would be stiffer and maybe stronger, just figured I'd ask opinions, since I know several people have had bad experiences with engine mounts on these things...
 
I tore both replacement mounts in less than 2 years. Pain in the butt to replace both of them. So I built my own. Nice part is, they won't let the motor flop and twitch if they fail...
 

Sponsored Ad

TRS Events & Gatherings

Featured Rangers

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

TRS Latest Video

Official TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Ranger Sponsors


Product Suggestions

Back
Top